F-Series and i-VTEC
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jakup,Oct 31 2005, 12:01 PM
With i/rh/e and Hondata tuning the K20a2 can put down as much as 205 horsepower to the wheels, which roughly is 30 more than stock.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Oct 31 2005, 12:03 PM
i/h/e, test pipe, and aftermarket ECU can put the S2000 into the 230-240whp range. that's 30-40whp more than stock. there have been dyno's showing as such in the UTH forum on more than one occasion.
our ECU is our biggest hinderance to unlocking n/a power.
our ECU is our biggest hinderance to unlocking n/a power.
Former Moderator
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Originally Posted by afwfjustin,Oct 31 2005, 05:55 PM
This thread is getting STUPID. You cannot compare a modded car to a stock car. Why don't we slap a turbo on with drag slicks vs. a stock winter tire S2000. Or better yet, vs. a Corvette Z06 with a 10 year old driving the car.
The S with (as I've mentioned) a 70mm exhaust, AEM EMS tune, and 4.56 gears (roughly 3000 dollars) will DESTROY a RSX S with 3000 in NA mods.
Wisconsin, just lock this thread and tell these kids to buy an RSX S already.
The S with (as I've mentioned) a 70mm exhaust, AEM EMS tune, and 4.56 gears (roughly 3000 dollars) will DESTROY a RSX S with 3000 in NA mods.
Wisconsin, just lock this thread and tell these kids to buy an RSX S already.
thats why I think its retarded people were trying to use the crappy version of the K motor as a comparison and why I brought up the K20R.... I think me and Wisconsin had about the most intelligent discussion regarding ENGINES... not cars...
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Originally Posted by '05 S2K SBM,Oct 31 2005, 06:24 PM
Wow...I've really stirred up the hornet's nest here. No need to get all excited. You must have misunderstood my point. My point was that you can take a stock S2K and a stock RSX-S, supercharge them and both will make nearly the same amount of power. To me that is discouraging but it is what it is.
[QUOTE]
Regarding straighline performance, here is a link to the 1/4 thread in the ClubRSX.com forum:
http://forums.clubrsx.com/showthread.php?t=319803
As you can see, the quickest time is 10.84@130.
I don't want to continue arguing with you, nor anyone else up in here.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Originally Posted by '05 S2K SBM,Oct 31 2005, 06:35 PM
The ECU will no longer be a hinderance since the '06 will have a programmable ECU. Hondata will be making a version of K-Pro for the '06 and it should be available around summer of '06.
UL has not mentioned anything on this site about the 06 RSX yet, so I can't comment on that.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,792
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee Area
Originally Posted by Dark_Sub_Rosa,Oct 31 2005, 06:51 PM
thats why I think its retarded people were trying to use the crappy version of the K motor as a comparison and why I brought up the K20R.... I think me and Wisconsin had about the most intelligent discussion regarding ENGINES... not cars...
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Oct 30 2005, 03:10 PM
very true
very FALSE. don't worry you're not the first person to make this mistake.
the F20C was designed from the bottom up, and was not based upon another platform. The only thing the F20B really even has in common with the F20C is the engine code name. Otherwise it's a new engineered design.
very FALSE. don't worry you're not the first person to make this mistake.
the F20C was designed from the bottom up, and was not based upon another platform. The only thing the F20B really even has in common with the F20C is the engine code name. Otherwise it's a new engineered design.
and from the article it stated..
"the model f20c is the upscale version of the f20b which has been the powerplant of the honda accord"
~taken from the the first paragraph of the article. i have it saved and can host it, if requested.
aslo...
"cylinder bore was increased from 85 to 87 mm and the stroke was reducded from 88 to 84 mm."
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Oct 31 2005, 06:07 PM
I wasn't talking about the RSX. I was talking about the S2000. the S2000's ECU is not programmable and cannot be flashed. there is no, nor will there be, any hondata reflash for the S2000.
UL has not mentioned anything on this site about the 06 RSX yet, so I can't comment on that.
UL has not mentioned anything on this site about the 06 RSX yet, so I can't comment on that.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Oct 31 2005, 06:05 PM
What psi were they running, and how much horsepower does it make? have they bored the engine at all? I have a feeling if you were to compare that RSX with our fastest S2000 (also 129mph trap), that you'd find there is more done to the RSX than the S2000.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dark_Sub_Rosa,Oct 31 2005, 05:51 PM
thats why I think its retarded people were trying to use the crappy version of the K motor as a comparison and why I brought up the K20R.... I think me and Wisconsin had about the most intelligent discussion regarding ENGINES... not cars...