S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

faster=better mpg

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #11  
Quick_Silver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Default

what are the optimal shift points for the best fuel efficiency on AP2s?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #12  
gomarlins3's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 23,396
Likes: 108
From: Kuna Idaho
Default

If that worked why don't we just drive 130 MPH and get 100 MPG? No, faster does not equal better miles per gallon.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
GotRPMs's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 5
Default

Gas mileage is compromised of many variables. Vehicle speed, engine speed, and throttle position to name a few. Drag does increase with speed but higher engine speed results in better efficiency but more fuel delivered. I beleieve that the s2000 flows so well at higher rpms that the increased drag can be overcome at speeds under 85.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #14  
5SAY307's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Republic of Taiwan
Default

again, some people claim that driving 85-90 mph gets them better mpg than 65. is there anyway that this is possible?
Maybe they never check their tire pressure, the tire pressure maybe too low to begine with.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #15  
ksdaoski's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
From: Formerly PDX now Pewaukee
Default

ive experienced pretty impressive MPG's when going 75-85 with lots of cruise....close to 30
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 12:16 PM
  #16  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Best milage I got was doing 75-80, I recieved 29.5mpg.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #17  
Eluded's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,214
Likes: 0
From: unknown
Default

No, the car doesn't get better mileage. Drive 100+ all the time and you'll get 15 or so. Now I get 23mpg and never have to worry about the man.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #18  
dolebludger's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 4
From: Durango, Colorado
Default

I believe that I am the one who made that claim. I drive from Oklahoma City to Dallas and back frequently. On the open parts of the interstate, I usually drive about 80 much of the time -- because that is the speed at which all the other traffic is moving. I get about 26.5 mpg. Once, I made the trip back, shall we say, at a little faster than usual speed. I had just filled up before leaving Dallas. When I got home, my gas gauge showed more gas left than is usuall on this trip. I immediately went and filled up to see what the mileage actually was. It was 29.5 mpg. My only mod is a "ram air" airscoop between grill and radiator that is designed to force air into the airbox, with the help of an AUT rad plate and CAI sealed in place.

I don't know how it happened, can't explain it, but it did happen.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #19  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Given consistent conditions, I attribute it to either bad math or bad liars.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #20  
ksdaoski's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
From: Formerly PDX now Pewaukee
Default

well i have nothing to gain from lieing about something so stupid...just telling what I have experienced....ymmv
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 AM.