S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

MMM...Aerodynamics...

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #71  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteS2k,Oct 7 2005, 04:01 PM
Add the aero-screen (either the OEM one or Rick's) plus the roll hoops/tall seats and see what happens to the air turbulance inside the cabin.
Great idea...I'll slowly refine this beast.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #72  
Silver9k's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 6
From: DFW, TX
Default

how about the stock spoiler?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #73  
pantyraider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 1
From: San Fran
Default

Is the "ride height" to scale on that model?

Could you try lowering it 1-2 inches front and back?

Also, you could try the top up with the spoiler.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #74  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default



This is what I am running over the weekend. It is slowly but surely becoming more S2000 like...

I cut the roof away a bit, added holes in front, flaps in front of the wheels. reshaped the front a bit.

I am meshing the bejesus out of this one too. It will probably take all weekend to run. Should turn out nicely...
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #75  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

I have access to a full, legal version of CFX here at work (and Ansys Workbench, and ProE Wildfire). I can help out with complex simulations since I have a fairly decent machine to run these sims on. Let me know if you need any help or even if you would like some different modelling done. Depending on how busy I am, I might be able to help.

EDIT: Sorry - I read page 3 before page 1. I'm sure your software can do anything CFX can. I might be able to help with an accurate model, though. Even adding "real" wheels would be pretty significant to the model, I would imagine.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #76  
sdputerbum's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

just wanted to throw in another "thanks" from yet another person who's helped this thread to achieve the low, low reply:read ratio of 6%

I really appreciate the effort that's going into this, it's fascinating stuff. Keep up the good work!
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #77  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy
I have access to a full, legal version of CFX here at work (and Ansys Workbench, and ProE Wildfire). I can help out with complex simulations since I have a fairly decent machine to run these sims on. Let me know if you need any help or even if you would like some different modelling done. Depending on how busy I am, I might be able to help.
CFX is one of our competitors. Although we don't view them as one much anymore.

I am using UG NX3 for the modeling and the two CAD packages are really incompatible. If you want to do some modeling, please, feel free. You can even send the models to me as I have Pro/E as well.

The latest pic there has the car's ground clearance at 5 inches. I realized that was a bit high and I just lowered it to 3.5. The wheels are now further up in the wells which looks pretty sweet. I can't wait to see how this one turns out.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #78  
03_AP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,951
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke
Default

now I see why those Amuse, TOP SECRET, J's Racing etc... carbon wings are so tall. It puts them in clean air that isn't disturbed by the car.

Just goes to show that those decklid level spoilers don't have much air going over them, according to this simulation anyways.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 04:10 PM
  #79  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by 03_AP1,Oct 7 2005, 04:05 PM
now I see why those Amuse, TOP SECRET, J's Racing etc... carbon wings are so tall. It puts them in clean air that isn't disturbed by the car.
If you stick a wing out in clean air, you simplify your design problem. If you put it in the flow that is already disturbed by the body, you have to do a lot more work in order to make sure the interactions are positive rather than negative. But it can be done.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #80  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by 03_AP1,Oct 7 2005, 07:05 PM
now I see why those Amuse, TOP SECRET, J's Racing etc... carbon wings are so tall. It puts them in clean air that isn't disturbed by the car.

Just goes to show that those decklid level spoilers don't have much air going over them, according to this simulation anyways.
They still have an effect. It's just lessened with the top down. The higher the wing the better typically. Formula One wings are mandated at a certain height to limit downforce. Same thing with the ALMS LMP-1 and LMP-2 class prototypes. You can see in this model that the flow separation region after the top of the windshield extends well past the rear of the car and contains the wing.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19 PM.