Muz x-brace First impressions
09-19-2002, 08:07 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bass
[B]
The only down side I see is that underside lift point (where the floor jack goes) is partially covered with the front of the x-brace..
[B]
The only down side I see is that underside lift point (where the floor jack goes) is partially covered with the front of the x-brace..
09-19-2002, 08:49 AM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
PsychoBen ~ yup looks pretty good....
Sideways ~ yup 28 ft lbs that was the spec listed on the instructions
ugotmade ~ I know what you mean but i'm pretty careful when using the jack. however i don't really see anyway around this issue now that the undercarrage jack point is partially covered.
Sideways ~ yup 28 ft lbs that was the spec listed on the instructions
ugotmade ~ I know what you mean but i'm pretty careful when using the jack. however i don't really see anyway around this issue now that the undercarrage jack point is partially covered.
09-19-2002, 01:37 PM
#7
I'm pretty sure the Helm's manual specifies 36 ft-lbs for those bolts without the brace. I would expect that the bolts should be AT LEAST that tight with the brace. I have the DiGrappa X-brace, and found that my bolts came loose when I only tightened them to 36, so I increased the torque to 45 ft-lbs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post