NA or FORCE INDUCTION? why?
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 1
From: GIlbert, AZ
I hate FI. I think companies that go FI are either admitting engineering defeat or doing it to make cheap power.
I don't understand why people would FI their S2ks. Honda built this motor to be one of the best production NA motors in the world. 100+ hp per litre with a redline of at least 8k... if they wanted to FI these cars, they wouldn't have gone to such lengths to make such a high-strung motor.
I don't understand why people would FI their S2ks. Honda built this motor to be one of the best production NA motors in the world. 100+ hp per litre with a redline of at least 8k... if they wanted to FI these cars, they wouldn't have gone to such lengths to make such a high-strung motor.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 3
Personally, I'd rather build a 2.4/2.5L stroker than go FI, even if FI does make more power in the top end.
But if you're talking about spending $3-4k for top JDM i/h/e products, you may as well use that money on a blower for better gains.
But if you're talking about spending $3-4k for top JDM i/h/e products, you may as well use that money on a blower for better gains.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,244
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by ArenG,Aug 9 2006, 09:03 AM
I hate FI. I think companies that go FI are either admitting engineering defeat or doing it to make cheap power.
I don't understand why people would FI their S2ks. Honda built this motor to be one of the best production NA motors in the world. 100+ hp per litre with a redline of at least 8k... if they wanted to FI these cars, they wouldn't have gone to such lengths to make such a high-strung motor.
I don't understand why people would FI their S2ks. Honda built this motor to be one of the best production NA motors in the world. 100+ hp per litre with a redline of at least 8k... if they wanted to FI these cars, they wouldn't have gone to such lengths to make such a high-strung motor.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
i like the response, peaky powerband associated with NA hondas. a modded NA car for me is just as much if not more fun to drive. i am sure my everlasting lust for power will have me no doubt boosted. but until then, i love my NA setup.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,867
Likes: 3
From: The South
Originally Posted by XclusiveAutosports,Aug 9 2006, 07:40 AM
errr... ok, but when I am making 170hp+ per liter AT THE WHEELS with the same motor, why not? I agree that honda did a great job with this motor so why not take advantage of a NA car that can take boost in stock form. Its a win-win situation the way I look at it. BTW, if you ever drove a turbo s2k you would probably change your mind very quickly.... they are lots of fun.
I would definitely love to turbo my S, but I want it to be "street legal" when I need it, and that is one of the reasons why I'd pick up the Comptech SC.
That is unless a turbo set up can yield the same result as the Comptech SC, carb wise of course.......
Is there a turbo set up that is carb approved????
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Originally Posted by kenstyle,Aug 9 2006, 08:40 AM
Personally, I'd rather build a 2.4/2.5L stroker than go FI, even if FI does make more power in the top end.
But if you're talking about spending $3-4k for top JDM i/h/e products, you may as well use that money on a blower for better gains.
But if you're talking about spending $3-4k for top JDM i/h/e products, you may as well use that money on a blower for better gains.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by versionJDM,Aug 9 2006, 08:20 AM
look at my sig. 221/143 to the wheels on a mustang dyno. for less than 1k.
