S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

need help, K&n FIPK 2 or PRM intake ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-16-2005, 07:56 PM
  #11  
WPS
Registered User
 
WPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: THEST1G
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think both will offer good sound because they expose the filter more. i would guess the kn would have less engine bog from heat since it isolates more. the prm is more pretty though.
consider the filter type too. i believe the cotton gauge is better than the foam type of comptech and i think prm uses foam too.
kn comes preoiled. no guessing.
comptech you are paying for the looks(carbon fiber lid) and less chance of void warranty.
Old 01-17-2005, 03:40 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
acurateg95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think I' gonna go with the K&N (comptech is too expensive)

PRM looks a lot nicer but, I looked the website and it also looks kinda cheap.

thanks a lot everyone



Old 01-17-2005, 05:38 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
bobbyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I had the prm great sound easy install no increase in hp .Now i have the comptech love the look setup increase throttle responce .As far as hp is concerned my butt say maybe some increase .My good friend just got the k&n and likes it but he also advised 9 hp increase is a just not true . I'm very impressed with people who can notice a 5 hp difference out of 240 hp without a dyno i guess they have a 6 th sense.
Old 01-18-2005, 07:06 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Zeniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Laguna Vista, Texas
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I installed the K&N in December and posted pics and info on the install at https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...f=133&t=256141

A former S2K owner with screen name of 850 did dyno runs with the K&N back to back within 20 minutes of each other on the same car. The posts from 850 dyno runs stock, with airbox lid off and with the K&N. Kind of confirms independently that there are gains but less than 9.5hp listed earier by K&N. Still impressive though for a simple intake change.

Without OEM lid Hp: 197.3
Without lid Torque: 132.5

Stock Wheel Hp is : 199.8
Stock Torque is: 134.4

K/N System Hp is: 204.4
K/N system Torque: 141.0

The link to the thread is: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=69312

It is an easy install and is completely reversible in about 30 minutes if needed. If I sell or trade the car I will probably take it off.

The sound of the intake is incredible, for nothing more it is worth it for me. It is a lower growl instead of the howl that you get when you remove the OEM airbox lid and really sounds great when in VTEC (it does howl a bit in VTEC, but with a really pleasant sound). I had expected an improvment in sound, but this is much better than I expected and a real plesant surprise.

The FIPK makes the S2000 sound like it should have stock and although I have no scientific data, the throttle response also seems to be much better, although it may be the placebo effect at play and for now I am very happy with the results.

Mi dos centavos
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bama
Want to Buy
0
10-15-2010 03:30 AM
Tech2uned
Texas - Houston S2000 Owners
6
07-19-2010 12:51 PM
FMINUS
S2000 Talk
72
05-23-2007 08:40 AM
Bosszuallo
JDM Tuning
9
08-16-2006 06:00 PM
FMINUS
S2000 Talk
2
06-22-2006 08:46 PM



Quick Reply: need help, K&n FIPK 2 or PRM intake ?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM.