NSX versus S2000
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
i had a choice of getting a used nsx for 30k or buying a brand new s2k for 29,500...i chose the s2k b/c it fits me better. im too young to own a exotic like the nsx anyways....and im not in a rush either.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Originally posted by EssTooKayTD
Road Rage, I think it's sweet how you own a Mustang, and have an S2000 on order...just thought I'd throw that in there.
Road Rage, I think it's sweet how you own a Mustang, and have an S2000 on order...just thought I'd throw that in there.
I can appreciate a tremednously powerful, almost brutish car that needs manly inputs to be driven right, and which can be made to run middle 10's for about $6k. A battle sword of the Medieval type - a delightful anachronism.
I can also respect the stilleto or rapier - precise cuts which, taken as one, are not impressive, but when done repeatedly and with skill, are just as deadly.
If you will indulge my metaphors, get my drift?
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
The S2000 has a much more rigid chassis than the NSX-T of any vintage (I've had 2 NSX-Ts). Once I got my first S2000, the NSX-T had to go. I got an NSX coupe instead. The NSX is much more poised and planted on the track and on the longer sweeping turns like ramps but the S2000 is better at autocrossing.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 25
From: Orange, California
i would not get a NSX unless it was a 97+ the 96 and below are about the same performance wise compared to the s2k. i would rather spend 30k on a s2k then 30k on a old nsx that will have more miles and perform the same.
