S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 Gas Milage

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 07:16 AM
  #11  
s2kvince's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 851
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

I can't believe it kept running with that little gas in the tank. I've never had a fill up above 11 gallons. I get 26-27mpg average.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #12  
S2Kage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,939
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

Originally Posted by ThuG LyFe,Sep 19 2008, 07:46 PM
sorry but it feels like i see a new mpg post every week...but it's good to see s2000's get good mpg. another pro to add to my countless reasons why s2k will be my next car.
Yeah but all them posts are usually... " Do S2000s get good gas milage when I floor it?"


[QUOTE]
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #13  
ACoF's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by S2Kage,Sep 20 2008, 08:20 AM
Whats VtecH?
http://www.vt.edu/
http://www.vtechkids.com/


Take your pick.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2008 | 11:12 PM
  #14  
DDonovan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,617
Likes: 1
From: Victoria, BC
Default

Originally Posted by ACoF,Sep 20 2008, 08:30 AM
Sorry, my bad, vtec..., :-(
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 12:06 AM
  #15  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Average 260miles per tank with CTSC about 325whp

N/A I averaged 300miles.

These are typically with no bars left, but on fill up ends up being aprox 11.5 gal to refill.

Our tank is 13.5gal correct?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #16  
S2Kage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,939
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

hmm i dunno, I always was under the impression it was 13.2 gallons.

Nice milage on CTSC... I take it your not full throttle too often?
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 07:31 AM
  #17  
SDredrider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by s2k2fear,Sep 19 2008, 08:15 PM
I found filling up at half a tank my MPG is higher. Im not sure what causes that, but numbers dont lie.
I agree with that.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 07:48 AM
  #18  
sandiegan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: 626
Default

I commute a lot usually get near 28mpg or 26 mpg with a couple of VTEC sprints
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #19  
dbourne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sandiegan,Sep 21 2008, 09:48 AM
I commute a lot usually get near 28mpg or 26 mpg with a couple of VTEC sprints
Friday I did a trip up the turnpike (OKC <> Tulsa). I filled up the day before with one trip home <> work. 'Filled up' after the trip, 321.6 miles, took 9.379 gallons = 34.3 mpg (450 miles on a tank??). My running average is 25.7 mpg. Of course the next tank will probably show poor mileage as I fill the tank 'more' completely.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 10:37 AM
  #20  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by S2Kage,Sep 21 2008, 06:32 AM
hmm i dunno, I always was under the impression it was 13.2 gallons.

Nice milage on CTSC... I take it your not full throttle too often?
Yes I think your right it is 13.2 now that you mention it.

The Centrifugal CTSC is a great way to get allot of power without allot of gas usage. 260 per tank is with lots of full throttle pulls, as many as I have room for, its too much fun. Thats why i got aprox 40 less miles per tank when I was N/A. 300 N/A was lots of hard running as well. The thing with a SC is it uses no more fuel when driving normal then an N/A car and obviously thats the majority of the driving on the street. A N/A car driving with the AC on would see less mileage on a tank then a SC car without, and certainly the N/A car would feel much more sluggish.

If you spin the CTSC pulley on the car when there is no belt attached you will notice there is no resistance, its almost like spinning a wheel on a skate board, therefor there is no power loss or drag on the engine to turn it when just cruising around, there is however constant forced air flow to the engine even though not under enough for boost register. I experienced under normal driving more engine response and less heat soak overall. In my experience I believe that driving with an CTSC if never brought into boost could likely see marginal better fuel mileage. This however is only a factor with conservative boost levels wile maintaining the use of factory fuel ejectors, I am pushing that threshold at 8 psi. Running 650cc at 10psi for example isn't going to work for fuel mileage, but 7psi or under with stock ejectors is likely, but with no boost usage as stated.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s9000
S2000 Talk
36
Jun 20, 2008 09:26 AM
igetpaid11
S2000 Talk
22
Apr 6, 2006 11:41 PM
Bane
S2000 Talk
27
Jan 24, 2005 11:52 AM
PilotChris
S2000 Under The Hood
5
Jan 11, 2005 07:06 AM
S2quick4U
S2000 Under The Hood
17
Nov 21, 2003 01:12 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 PM.