S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 tows like a champ!

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #111  
altiain's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 1
From: North Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Sep 13 2004, 04:59 PM
Which "chain" are you referring to? There are really 2 parts of this puzzle that could be characterized as a "chain". The 1st is the portion of the frame that is behind the rear wheels (link 1) and the hitch (link 2). This chain certainly sees MANY times more load than it is designed for. This was my primary concern, especially since the weak link is the hitch attached to sheet metal. This proved to be okay, since nothing even flexed during the tow (no cracks in the paint globs).
Summarized as "Hey, I overloaded it once, and nothing bad happened. Ergo, nothing bad will happen, no matter how many times I overload it."

Riiiiight.

Mike and Blitz have made some good points about fatigue failure. You might want to do some more research on the subject.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #112  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

I will replace the fender washers inside the trunk with thicker plates. However, the only failures I've seen where the trunk bottom failed were with the older Da'Lan hitch that only had 2 bolts. I also suspect that the tire trailers had too little tongue weight causing the hitch to pull down (pivot) on the bolts instead of pushing up onto the trunk pan when going over bumps. I know that the tire trailers are probably only around 500 lbs fully loaded with tools and tires, but they aren't being pulled at 30 MPH on a flat, smooth road for about 2 miles round trip. Even still, I will certainly keep an eye on the mounts.

In my previous thread, I was mainly concerned about the bolts that mount the bumper rail to the car. After inspecting those mounts with the bumper cover removed, they look to be MUCH stronger than the mounts in the trunk pan. If a failure begins to occur, I think it will be most apparent below the trunk. The paint blobs will remain on the mounts, so any sign of fatigue should cause cracks in the paint before a catastrophic failure.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:15 PM
  #113  
altiain's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 1
From: North Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by gernby,Sep 13 2004, 04:30 PM
You are still missing the point that the ONLY SOURCE OF FORCE in the system is the engine! If the engine delivers 100 ft-lbs of torque to the drivetrain, THAT IS ALL THE DRIVETRAIN WILL HAVE TO SUSTAIN! If the engine can't produce enough forward force to pull the load, then it WON'T MOVE! The ONLY way to increase the force on the drivetrain is to increase the output of the engine, or dump the clutch! This is an absolute FACT!
Strange - I thought you were trying to pull a boat with mass up a sloped ramp, which would indeed suggest that there are forces other than the engine acting against you.

I take it all back - if your boat has no mass, then towing it with the S2000 probably won't do any damage.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #114  
dut's Avatar
dut
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,369
Likes: 0
From: Murrieta, CA
Default

- it works. the end
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #115  
CrazyPhuD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,759
Likes: 0
From: SF, California
Default



No more.....no more....

Congrats again the gernby that it works. I'm sure he'll keep any potential stress/fatigue under observation.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #116  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by altiain,Sep 13 2004, 07:00 PM
Now why do you suppose that increasing the "stickiness" of the tires would increase the possibility of a differential failure, like those occasionally experienced by Stock class autocrossers? I wonder if it has anything to do with increasing the resistance of the system to the input torque of the engine.

Nah, that can't be. After all, you haven't increased the output torque of the engine, so according to your reasoning how on earth could the system be seeing a higher load spike?

Must be magic... maybe intuitive physics or voodoo or something.
This is getting rediculous Iain. The dynamics of high RPM launches are completely different from that of towing. When towing, the loads are delivered slowly and conservatively, which negates almost all the additional shock and stress of the flywheel. Autocrossing with sticky tires and grippy clutches could easily double or triple the amount of short term torque to the drivetrain with their high RPM rapid clutch dumps. I'm not in the mood to do the math to figure out the amount of instantaneous torque that would be provided by an 18 lbs rotating mass at 9K RPM during a 1/2 second clutch engagement. We aren't dealing with that issue at all here.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #117  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by altiain,Sep 13 2004, 07:04 PM
You really think so?

So... if I suspend the rear wheels of your car in the air, rev it up to 7000rpm and release the clutch, the system will see the exact same load as it would if I rigidly fixed the rear hubs so that they can't move, revved the car up to 7000rpm and released the clutch?

Are you sure about that, gernby?
Don't be stupid. I have explicitly stated that no clutch dumps are a part of this. If you engage the clutch slowly at 3K rpms (with the wheels in the air), then go WOT ... the drivetrain will see even more torque than it does while pulling the boat. However, you will hit redline very quickly, and the torque will end.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #118  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by altiain,Sep 13 2004, 07:09 PM
Summarized as "Hey, I overloaded it once, and nothing bad happened. Ergo, nothing bad will happen, no matter how many times I overload it."

Riiiiight.

Mike and Blitz have made some good points about fatigue failure. You might want to do some more research on the subject.
Resorting to a different argument, since the 1st one didn't work out? Did you not grasp what I was saying about continued monitoring of the attachment points?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 04:58 PM
  #119  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

[QUOTE=altiain,Sep 13 2004, 07:15 PM] Strange - I thought you were trying to pull a boat with mass up a sloped ramp, which would indeed suggest that there are forces other than the engine acting against you.

I take it all back - if your boat has no mass, then towing it with the S2000 probably won't do any damage.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 05:54 PM
  #120  
allkingz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,985
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Default

I'm just glad no one has resorted to name-calling and forced a mod to jump in and lock this thread.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 AM.