S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 tows like a champ!

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #121  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by rickycrx,Sep 13 2004, 03:24 PM
This is true...

And like I said in my post -- I have no doubt that his drivetrain will be able to handle it. That's not the "weak point" in what he's doing. You can be gentle enough to any drivetrain to not abuse it, even when doing the most difficult of things (like pulling his boat with an S2000). It's just that other parts of the car (frame, sheet metal, etc) will not hold up to it for an appreciable amount of time.

God forbid he has to make a 'panic stop' for ANY reason whatsoever. He WILL do damage to the car where the hitch receiver attaches if he has to go from 30-0mph as quickly as possible.
I just now saw this post.

The good thing about this hitch design is that the force during a sudden stop are pressed in the best direction of the mounts. For example, the 2 mounts on the bumper rail are right up agains the frame. If the bumper rail can't handle the force, the frame will help. The lower hitch mounts would be pressed INTO the trunk pan, instead of pulling away. I think the hitch could withstand much more decelleration than it could accelleration. Basically, during a stop, the bolts have very little load on them.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #122  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by allkingz,Sep 13 2004, 08:54 PM
I'm just glad no one has resorted to name-calling and forced a mod to jump in and lock this thread.
I thought I did do some name calling earlier...

Was it okay for me to call the people in the other thread "dumb asses"?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #123  
XSharp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Thumbs down

THE VIDEO

S2000_towing_boat.wmv
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 10:01 PM
  #124  
s2kjay's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: fontana
Default

im glad you did what you did..i was wrong..im not to proud to admit it..i still dont think you should try it again..but im still happy you did what you did..congrats
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 04:42 AM
  #125  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

OMG!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 05:24 AM
  #126  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by XSharp,Sep 14 2004, 12:20 AM
Thanks for hosting it for me!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 06:34 AM
  #127  
jays2k02's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs
Default

Amazing!!!

Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 07:05 AM
  #128  
s2kpdx01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,561
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Default

[QUOTE=BlitzSRM,Sep 13 2004, 07:20 AM] altiain,
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 10:57 AM
  #129  
BlitzSRM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 0
From: Waikele
Default

[QUOTE=s2kpdx01,Sep 14 2004, 05:05 AM]No offense to all the physics guru's in here, but many very smart scientists think inertia is very real and is caused by the higgs field.
http://hepwww.ph.qmw.ac.uk/epp/higgs1.html
http://www.hep.umn.edu/~marshak/elempart5.pdf

Go read some books about physics that aren't very technical and you will find out about this higgs field and how it isn't the new aether or anything like that. I do agree that in a completely frictionless environment you could move the boat with your pinky (assuming you were standing on the frictioned surfice!! ), albeit very slowly.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #130  
Gernby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by BlitzSRM,Sep 14 2004, 01:57 PM
that is the difference between scientist and engineer. engineers, makes assumptions that are good enough. much like the example below:

A mathematician, a physicist, and an engineer were asked to review this mathematical problem. In a high school gym, all the girls in the class were lined up against one wall, and all the boys against the opposite wall. Then, every ten seconds, they walked toward each other until they were half the previous distance apart. The mathematician, physicist, and engineer were asked, " When will the girls and boys meet?"
The mathematician said, " Never."
The physicist said, " In an infinite amount of time."

The engineer said, " Well... in about two minutes, they'll be close enough for all practical purposes."

I think it would depend on how accurate the measuring devices were. Considering these are high school boys and girls, I think some of them would be shagging before too long.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:30 AM.