S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 watered down for 2004?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 06:07 AM
  #41  
TrueDrezzer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
From: N
Default

Well after Honda released the S600 with its 9500rpm redline, the S800 that followed upped the power and torque but dropped the redline down to 8500rpm.

The S800M also had to do without the original chain-drive independent rear suspension and instead went with a more economical live rear end.

Unfortunately, marketing and economy does play a role in selling cars. Let's wait and see how the 2004 model looks and drives before making too many harsh comments though.

///Robin
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 07:35 AM
  #42  
joe_s2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,821
Likes: 0
From: HouStook TX
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by lanbrown
[B]

It could be an opening to an
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 07:52 AM
  #43  
F2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle
Default

The big question is: Will the 2.2 L engine be the same with the 2.0 L, but just of bigger cylinder capacity? Or will it be a new more compromised engine, which will achieve its power through the increase in capacity and without the technology to withstand the high RPM's of the 2.0 L?

If the second is the case, then Honda effectively throws an engine with dozens of international awards to the bin, just to achieve a bit more torque.

The S2000 was recognised world-wide for its engine. Yes, it has the X-bone frame chassis and the in-wheel suspension, but the masterpiece was the engine. In fact the 2.0L engine of the S2000 is what makes the car of historic importance, and a classic. That engine was a technological achievement.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 09:04 AM
  #44  
Siper2's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
From: Dillsburg, PA
Default

I received a Report about this thread, but after looking it through, excepting a few "off" comments, I see no reason to Dumpsterize it.

I'm just going to ask everybody to please keep it clean, that's all. "Speculation threads" like this one tend to get heated.

Thanks guys!!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:08 AM
  #45  
lanbrown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Farmington Hills
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by joe_s2k
[B]

But the pure version is already out.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #46  
blazinasian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Midland
Default

Does anyone know if the 04' will still be a roadster? I've heard of a speculated coupe version, but by the looks of it, I'll be sticking with the roadster. It looks so much cooler.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2003 | 09:56 PM
  #47  
iCEE's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

funny... the 04 can come with a bigger engine, more power, a better transmission, whatever... i don't care... but if it comes with clear corners, i'll be pissed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B.C.
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
3
Oct 9, 2003 04:58 PM
Chris Type R
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
3
Oct 2, 2003 07:13 AM
Jibb47
S2000 Talk
1
Sep 1, 2003 09:40 PM
Christople
S2000 Talk
52
Jun 30, 2003 04:57 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 PM.