S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2k tested in New Road & Track

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #51  
BBY2KS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,098
Likes: 1
From: Lake Stevens, WA
Default

If it works, who cares? I feel the same about pushrod engines.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #52  
124Spider's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, Washington, USA
Default

Originally Posted by tritium_pie' date='Jan 29 2005, 11:11 PM
I looked it up. it really does use leaf springs. don't really understand this.

http://www.maximum-cars.com/Cars/Car.php?carnumber=519
It uses a pushrod engine, too. So what? I'd take one....
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #53  
r2d2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Prague
Default

Originally Posted by revhi' date='Jan 29 2005, 06:23 PM
I saw it, why are the Vette and Viper being compared with those others?
Well, well, well... now I can see why all tests are biased... I purchased 05 Viper SRT10 6 weeks ago and put around 2000 miles on it. I am still keeping my 02 S2k. Offcourse - one can't justify viper being almost 3x more then S. But then - having a sports car is not always about money, is it... Can you compare viper and S? Absolutely not. Each is a champ in their personalities. Can you compare viper/S with porsches? NO! In viper/S YOU drive, in porsches THEY drive for you. (By THEM I mean electronics to be clear.)

Enjoy whatever you drive!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #54  
Axel6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k' date='Jan 30 2005, 08:26 AM
but i think no one is arguing the fact that tha ap2 while not quite as able as the ap1 on the track
Funny, many people (including the new R&T article) think the AP2 is more capable and easier to drive fast at the track and complain of the "twitchiness" of the AP1.

Again, this is a useless debate. The cars are really not that different.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #55  
vroom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: NOVA/SI NY
Default

Axel6 that stuff flat cracks me up - I think that it was your car (?) that Don S drove at an MClub autox and came back RAVING about getting an 04/05 and using it as an SM2 (or something - i fergit) autox car. pssst, he's driven ones like mine and never got that enthusiastic - so the 04 must have something going to make him want to leave his RX-7. The same thing happened at the NNJ Test and Tune last year when everyone who drove the 04 raved about it "best car I've ever slalomed in" was one quote - all those drivers have driven other versions including the auther of the above quote who co-drove my '02 last year at a few events.

...Must be something really wrong with those 04's that real drivers, hard core autox enthusiasts, actually found them superior to the AP1. I think that folks who use the car as a tool don't need the accolades of taming some beast - they just want the car to do what they ask of it.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #56  
kitwetzler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

Originally Posted by PilotKD' date='Jan 29 2005, 06:40 PM
13.9 @ 100mph!
I did 14.0 at 102mph... I suck at launching though.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #57  
flitcroft's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

I find it funny that the C6 gets such accolades. I really wanted to like it when I drove it this past Saturday. The car is beautiful, but you sit in the drivers seat and the chair feels like it is a $4 Ikea lawn chair wriggling around behind you. The instruments all disappear with Polarized glasses on. The dash goodies, apart from the nice instrument cluster, are utter crap. All three pedals are squishy, wooden, and have little feel. The gearchange feels like you are stirring a pot of rubber with a three foot spoon.

There is magic. Nail the throttle and the front of the car rises a bit. The torque is monstrous. In a small slalom part of an autocross course your foot barely brushes the gas pedal in second. Without traction control you'd probably do donuts if you sneezed. For the price, the power is addictive, but 99%+ of the time you are not nailing the throttle. The car just doesn't cut it.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #58  
Axel6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

[quote name='vroom' date='Jan 31 2005, 01:48 PM'] Axel6 that stuff flat cracks me up - I think that it was your car (?) that Don S drove at an MClub autox and came back RAVING about getting an 04/05 and using it as an SM2 (or something - i fergit) autox car.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #59  
glagola1's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Default

You guys should read what they are saying over on the 350 boards. Ha ha ha, they're not too happy.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 01:48 PM
  #60  
hpark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by flitcroft' date='Feb 1 2005, 01:36 AM
I find it funny that the C6 gets such accolades. I really wanted to like it when I drove it this past Saturday. The car is beautiful, but you sit in the drivers seat and the chair feels like it is a $4 Ikea lawn chair wriggling around behind you. The instruments all disappear with Polarized glasses on. The dash goodies, apart from the nice instrument cluster, are utter crap. All three pedals are squishy, wooden, and have little feel. The gearchange feels like you are stirring a pot of rubber with a three foot spoon.

There is magic. Nail the throttle and the front of the car rises a bit. The torque is monstrous. In a small slalom part of an autocross course your foot barely brushes the gas pedal in second. Without traction control you'd probably do donuts if you sneezed. For the price, the power is addictive, but 99%+ of the time you are not nailing the throttle. The car just doesn't cut it.
yep there are many things they can improve on the C6, but the accel and handling characteristics for a $50K car can't be beat.....unless you move up to 997.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:41 AM.