Scathing review of Mx5 v S2000
there's no problem w/ what he's sayin, i guess a guy's entitled to his opinions. but he lost all credibility when he said: "we were never totally in love with the s2000 gearshift quality." and for him to rate it 3rd, behind VW nevertheless is just absurd by any stretch of imagination.
his opinion also seem to waver in the wind, if what they liked a few years and perceived as strength can change so drastically and so quickly further depletes any merit of the judgement or review.
his opinion also seem to waver in the wind, if what they liked a few years and perceived as strength can change so drastically and so quickly further depletes any merit of the judgement or review.
Originally Posted by S2KinVA,May 16 2006, 10:15 AM
To tell you the truth, I could care less what the "experts" think.
It's nothing more than an opinion. Chances are anyone who is considering getting an mx5 or an s2000 cares more about fun than the quantifiable figues of a car anyway.
Originally Posted by Ruprecht,May 16 2006, 10:28 AM
How can the Mx5 be a better car...it cost less than the S2k.
It paints us out to be chumps and wannabes who overpaid for under performance.
This stinks!!
It paints us out to be chumps and wannabes who overpaid for under performance.
This stinks!!
The S2000 wins!
It has the fastest soft top
It lets the most wind through your hair
That is what Soft Tops are all about.
GPWonTan Posted on May 16 2006, 04:03 PM
That is what I was thinking.
It has the fastest soft top
It lets the most wind through your hair
That is what Soft Tops are all about.
GPWonTan Posted on May 16 2006, 04:03 PM
there's no problem w/ what he's sayin, i guess a guy's entitled to his opinions. but he lost all credibility when he said: "we were never totally in love with the s2000 gearshift quality." and for him to rate it 3rd, behind VW nevertheless is just absurd by any stretch of imagination.




