S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Secret Compartment

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 05:57 AM
  #41  
thebig33tuna's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Originally Posted by X4DLuvOfSpeedX,Nov 6 2008, 09:26 AM
They have to read you your rights before they oficially arrest you, not before they cuff you. He was released, not arrested.
^ this is wrong. edited my original post, cause i was wrong. case in point what i just said below...

lots of misinformation in this thread. don't post up acting like you're a lawyer when you aren't, people. if you want real legal advice, call a *real* lawyer. the phone call is almost always free.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #42  
liquid_helix136's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by thebig33tuna,Nov 6 2008, 06:57 AM

lots of misinformation in this thread. don't post up acting like you're a lawyer when you aren't, people. if you want real legal advice, call a *real* lawyer. the phone call is almost always free.
true good call
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #43  
Danknee's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

You should call your congressman. By law that police officer is now required to drive you to work and back each day, with the lights and siren blazing (As provided by the 28th amendment). This is going to pay off for you big time, think of the gas savings!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 12:25 AM
  #44  
NorthWestS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

back in my younger days i got off on a charge because the cop had no reason to pull me over and lied about getting consent from the owner of the car that i was driving, so he searched it and once i got to court the cop knew he didnt have a chance and it was dropped
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 12:26 AM
  #45  
NorthWestS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

btw it was for having one coors light in my car when i was underage
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 04:04 AM
  #46  
VaderS2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 751
Likes: 7
From: Gibsonburg, OH
Default

^^^ I would've arrested you for having that brand of beer, hillbilly.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #47  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Your rights have to be read before you're interrogated...

Miranda v. Arizona
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 06:35 AM
  #48  
thebig33tuna's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

yah. not interrogated exactly... under police custody.

Originally Posted by wikipedia
In the United States, the Miranda warning is a warning given by police to criminal suspects in police custody, or in a custodial situation, before they are asked guilt-seeking questions relating to the commission of a crime. A custodial situation is one in which the suspect's freedom of movement is restrained although he or she is not under arrest. An incriminating statement by a suspect will not constitute admissible evidence unless the suspect was advised of his or her "Miranda rights" and made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of those rights.
from wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_rights

now, somehow if a cop pulls you over and asks 'do you know how fast you were going?' i'm guessing answering anything over the speed limit is incriminating even though you never got your miranda rights. oh well.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #49  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by thebig33tuna,Nov 7 2008, 03:35 PM
yah. not interrogated exactly... under police custody.

Originally Posted by wikipedia
In the United States, the Miranda warning is a warning given by police to criminal suspects in police custody, or in a custodial situation, before they are asked guilt-seeking questions relating to the commission of a crime. A custodial situation is one in which the suspect's freedom of movement is restrained although he or she is not under arrest. An incriminating statement by a suspect will not constitute admissible evidence unless the suspect was advised of his or her "Miranda rights" and made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of those rights.
from wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_rights

now, somehow if a cop pulls you over and asks 'do you know how fast you were going?' i'm guessing answering anything over the speed limit is incriminating even though you never got your miranda rights. oh well.
My point is, you can be under custody and not be read your rights. When they start questioning you (read: interrogation) you must have been made aware of what your options are.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 06:47 AM
  #50  
thebig33tuna's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32,283
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

i get what you're saying. just thought i'd elaborate.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM.