S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

SuperCharged or TurboCharged?? that is the question

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
bustin pee pee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: pembroke pines
Default SuperCharged or TurboCharged?? that is the question

ok.... all if have seen is people talkin about is the supercharged s2000. does anyone have one turbocharged. im interested in doin one or the other.. but i want to the know whats the diff in power and not as much maintanence and price range... so if anyone of you wise people out there can help.. it will be highly appreciated..
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 12:25 PM
  #2  
Sime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: Ex-pat f/Melbourne, Au. Now in
Default

Do a search. You'll find plenty on the topic!!

Basically, the consensus was that the turbo does make more power and useable torque, but it will cost you nearly twice as much to go for the turbo route. Your underhood temps will be much higher with the Turbo too.

I think that the Turbo and the Supercharger both put out about ~ 300 rwhp on 93 pump gas, (turbo at 6psi?), but to get 330 rwhp out of the turbo at 8psi meant that you have to run race gas, or at least octane enhanced gas.

With regards to long term reliability, the Comptech has had some early bugs removed and there is now a large number of street miles from a large number of people who have them, however, there are only I believe up to 3 turbo S2000's at this time. If you go the turbo route, Speedcraft seems to be the way to go.

A lot of us are waiting with baited breath for the Vortech Supercharger. It will be interesting to see what they come up with. Just a matter of time now. BTW, Vortech were last claiming an extra 100 RWHP at 7000rpm, with more power to come.

I would really like a turbo myself, but at approx $8000+ installed with all the bits needed to run it, it's a little out of my league. The Supercharger at around $4-4.5K is much more viable.

Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 12:27 PM
  #3  
bustin pee pee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: pembroke pines
Default

very helpful indeed.. thank you!!!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2002 | 12:37 PM
  #4  
bayarea408's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,594
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

if you want low maintenance, neither Turbo or SC, since getting neither one no matter what will put more stress on your motor. i would recommend going with a turbo system if you dont have a problem passing smog in your state. even though the SC is good, but i think you will be better off with the performance of a turbo instead.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gfresh86
S2000 Forced Induction
14
Jan 10, 2017 09:51 AM
youngkilla
S2000 Forced Induction
16
May 31, 2012 03:40 AM
wildkart
S2000 Forced Induction
38
Feb 24, 2012 09:19 AM
Tyraid2K
S2000 Forced Induction
3
Dec 1, 2006 07:11 PM
lwp
S2000 Under The Hood
12
Jan 2, 2005 05:17 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 AM.