S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Upgraded clutch/flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 05:34 AM
  #21  
papa5murf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 43,083
Likes: 0
From: London, England
Default

the exedy hyper single on the S is a nice clutch however.. as stated above... it's either on/off... there is no play in the clutch at all.. and it's relatively hard... so if you drive in traffic a lot... stay away from it...

the act and comptech setup is very streetable.....

as for your question about the toda over the comptech.... depending on what you want to do, and what your goals are with the car..... if you end up going too light on your flywheel you will lose some low end torque... so if you drive your car daily, and there's some stop and go traffic here and there, get the comptech..... if you live in the country... lots of open road and you're "road" tracking the car a lot and don't really care about the little loss of torque down low..... go with the toda...
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 06:05 AM
  #22  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by blue03s2k,Dec 27 2005, 07:34 AM
as for your question about the toda over the comptech.... depending on what you want to do, and what your goals are with the car..... if you end up going too light on your flywheel you will lose some low end torque... so if you drive your car daily, and there's some stop and go traffic here and there, get the comptech..... if you live in the country... lots of open road and you're "road" tracking the car a lot and don't really care about the little loss of torque down low..... go with the toda...
Dang...we all know that we can't afford to lose anymore torque on our S.

Also, how does a lighter flywheel translate into losing low-end torque? Seems to me that less unsprung weight = more torque. I don't know for sure so please correct me if I am wrong.
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #23  
TheCarGuy2021's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
From: El Segundo, CA
Default

^^^ Inertia... more rotating mass=harder to stop/slow down... less rotating mass = easier to stop/slow down
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 08:50 AM
  #24  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheCarGuy2021,Dec 27 2005, 10:48 AM
^^^ Inertia... more rotating mass=harder to stop/slow down
Ok...I am far from being a science buff so please forgive me in advance for what I am about to say.

It seems to me that a lighter object would have less rotating mass, and would therefore be easier to stop/slow down.

Since the Toda flywheel is lighter, wouldn't it have less rotating mass?
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #25  
papa5murf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 43,083
Likes: 0
From: London, England
Default

thats exactly it...

less rotating mass means it's easier to stop/slow down/start..... so it takes more power/force to actually keep it moving.....when it's stopped it doesn't take much force to move it.. but once moving you need more force to keep it moving...

with more rotating mass.... it takes longer for it to stop/slow down/start... so once it's moving, it doesn't take as much power/force to keep it moving because the weight of it aids in keeping it moving...

a lighter flywheel looses some ability to transfer power....

you have to find the proper ballance for your particular application and car....
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 09:04 AM
  #26  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by blue03s2k,Dec 27 2005, 11:02 AM
thats exactly it...

less rotating mass means it's easier to stop/slow down/start..... so it takes more power/force to actually keep it moving.....when it's stopped it doesn't take much force to move it.. but once moving you need more force to keep it moving...

with more rotating mass.... it takes longer for it to stop/slow down/start... so once it's moving, it doesn't take as much power/force to keep it moving because the weight of it aids in keeping it moving...

a lighter flywheel looses some ability to transfer power....

you have to find the proper ballance for your particular application and car....
Umm, ok. Doesn't make perfect sense to me, but like I said before this isn't my area of expertise so I'll rely on you guys.
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 03:21 PM
  #27  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,379
Likes: 432
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

Product inquiry, Moving to S2000 talk.
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 03:46 PM
  #28  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Default

I appreciate everyone's comments thus far. I am really learning towards the Exedy Hyper Single simply because I have it in my Civic and really like it (with the exception of it bucking when I am in traffic).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Charper732
S2000 Forced Induction
6
May 10, 2017 01:52 PM
Orpheus
S2000 Modifications and Parts
6
Jan 30, 2011 01:55 PM
mike88 s2k
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
6
Aug 29, 2009 12:14 PM
s4000k racing
S2000 Forced Induction
41
May 29, 2007 05:31 PM
pfb
S2000 Racing and Competition
42
Jun 13, 2003 10:54 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24 AM.