What would you do?
I'm a little concerned that the unknown party in this incident has been pre-crucified. We haven't heard their side of the story, and considering the comments made in this thread I doubt they'd be in any particular hurry to come forward.
krazik, I really think you've made this person lose face, whether they are in the wrong or not. I don't think it's going to help your case.
Bieg, it's not your IQ I'm worried about. What motivates you to go out of your way to antagonise people. Young drivers have a hard enough time finding respect for 'peace' officers. You're doing little to help.
krazik, I really think you've made this person lose face, whether they are in the wrong or not. I don't think it's going to help your case.
Bieg, it's not your IQ I'm worried about. What motivates you to go out of your way to antagonise people. Young drivers have a hard enough time finding respect for 'peace' officers. You're doing little to help.
Originally posted by AusS2000:
Bieg, it's not your IQ I'm worried about. What motivates you to go out of your way to antagonise people. Young drivers have a hard enough time finding respect for 'peace' officers. You're doing little to help.
Bieg, it's not your IQ I'm worried about. What motivates you to go out of your way to antagonise people. Young drivers have a hard enough time finding respect for 'peace' officers. You're doing little to help.
Remember back in elementary school when one kid would go cry to the teacher? Remember how some kids would hang around after school and beat him up?
Well, Krazik is the crybaby and Beig is the bully.
Such is life, in all its natural, harsh glory.
Well, Krazik is the crybaby and Beig is the bully.
Such is life, in all its natural, harsh glory.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Bieg, it's not your IQ I'm worried about. What motivates you to go out of your way to antagonise people.
See if anyone expresses opinions contrary to his own he feels compelled to attack them, many times in a personal manner so therefor he is fair game.
Do a search on his comments in other threads before you jump all over me if you don't mind.
Bieg -
A sure way to not get people to jump all over you is to ignore rude comments made about yourself.
If the *high road* were taken the the comments ignored, people will ask the commentors "Why are you doing and saying that?"
And the moderators will find it necessary to speak with the people making comments about you.
A sure way to not get people to jump all over you is to ignore rude comments made about yourself.
If the *high road* were taken the the comments ignored, people will ask the commentors "Why are you doing and saying that?"
And the moderators will find it necessary to speak with the people making comments about you.
The problem with continuing arguements between threads is that the first person to say something personal and inflammatory appears to come from nowhere.
It isn't anyone else's responsibility to read previous posts to see if two members have a beef with each other.
It isn't anyone else's responsibility to read previous posts to see if two members have a beef with each other.
Thank you Dented...my point exactly. Bieg, if you don't like krazik, that's fine. Just dislike him silently, and there's no problem with that. If you want to turn every thread that he talks in into a locked one, then you have the problem.




