Would you want "syncrorev" in the S?
From best to worst (in relation to sporty/sports cars)
Manual
Sycro-cheat
Sequential Manual/DSG
Auto with Paddles
Regular auto
Chauffers
Now, that said, I would not refuse to buy a car on the basis of it having sycro-rev, so long as I could switch it off.
Now I also dont see anything wrong with a sequential on a full race car if it is put there for performance reasons. but a road going Sports car is about the fun and driving experience more than anything.
Manual
Sycro-cheat
Sequential Manual/DSG
Auto with Paddles
Regular auto
Chauffers
Now, that said, I would not refuse to buy a car on the basis of it having sycro-rev, so long as I could switch it off.
Now I also dont see anything wrong with a sequential on a full race car if it is put there for performance reasons. but a road going Sports car is about the fun and driving experience more than anything.
I think it's neat from a technical standpoint. But I wouldn't want it, or pay extra for that feature. If it was a standard option and I can turn it off - then whatever. I think it's a feaure that makes "sport driving" more accessible to people who want a sporty car but don't exactly want to fuss with all the "purity" of heel-toe. It's like Paddle shifters, the technology is getting so good that's it's performance exceeds Manual shifting but the enthusiasts will always dislike them.
If' you've never driven a Z with S mode on it's like a normal MT, but when you shift down it blips the throttle/rev-matches perfectly. It does it right when the clutch is re-engaged (clutch pedal released). So no matter how slowly or quickly you release the pedal it rev matches seamlessly. They're idiot proofing three pedal work.
If' you've never driven a Z with S mode on it's like a normal MT, but when you shift down it blips the throttle/rev-matches perfectly. It does it right when the clutch is re-engaged (clutch pedal released). So no matter how slowly or quickly you release the pedal it rev matches seamlessly. They're idiot proofing three pedal work.
Originally Posted by deibit,Jun 8 2010, 06:50 AM
there's only one thing that it's worse than "synchro-revs"... and it's called "automatic transmission"..
oh wait.. there's something even worse.. "chauffeurs"
oh wait.. there's something even worse.. "chauffeurs"

I don't really care if I don't rev-match perfectly every time. I'd rather do it myself just because it's fun to do. I wouldn't want something that automatically steers the car for me either because I like steering it myself. It's a fun car to drive, I wouldn't want anything taken away from the experience.
The S seemed like one of the last cars that didn't have all these electronic helpers, besides the VSA in later AP2s. That's one of the reasons I think it will be hard for me to find a replacement. Oh well, S2K for life!
Nope.
The 370z can keep that one for all I care. And anyone who's swayed over to that camp due to that feature would be happier with that car over the S anyway.
[edit]- I can't drive ANY manual transmission without rev matching. It's just engrained in my head as part of the downshift procedure
The 370z can keep that one for all I care. And anyone who's swayed over to that camp due to that feature would be happier with that car over the S anyway.
[edit]- I can't drive ANY manual transmission without rev matching. It's just engrained in my head as part of the downshift procedure






