No thanks.
I've gotten so used to rev-match downshifting that I do it all the time. I enjoy it. I don't want a computer doing it for me.

 

I would vote no on this, just because I would never use it. If Honda made a successor, I would rather they work on a compact lightweight larger displacement 6-cyl engine instead of something superfluous like sycrorev.

Daily driving, I double clutch all my downshifts so the syncrorev would not help. When I'm having fun, I want to be in full control and practice my rev-match so the syncrorev wouldn't help there either.

If they made a syncrorev that could double clutch downshifts though, I might be tempted to reconsider.

 

++

 

No, becuase deep down it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy that i can rev match and heel toe. If the car did it for me i couldnt tell ppl how awesome i am that i do it.

 

more electronics jazz to get in the way of just driving.

 

I drove a 370...fun ass car, love the rev match its really cool but i wouldnt want it on the s.

 

Yeah, with "rev match" any yuppie poser can look like they know how to drive...

 

Couldn't this be said of syncros?

It's just an another improvement to make it easier to drive well.

 

It wouldn't be a non-selling point, nor a selling point to me. As long as like VSA it could be turned off for AutoX / Track days I see no harm in it. I have a bad knee and am 6'2", and like to sit closer to the steering wheel with my legs more bent then straight. Unfortunately without seat rails this makes heel-toe'ing not the easiest/comfiest of tasks so for DD, I honestly wouldn't mind it. But normal rev matching is easy enough. I guess my point is, for DD I wouldn't mind as long as when I'm getting spirited+ I could turn it off.

 

my last three cars have had drive by wire TB's, after getting my 02 s2k in october 2009 I can't tell you how much I've missed cable throttle bodies, so no way to synchrorev.