S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Amuse vs Toda Header.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:37 AM
  #51  
beroznikmal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 3
From: yes
Default

Wael El-Dasher,
I think he was saying that at WOT, when compared to the baseline dyno (with Mugen Headers, before the TODA installation), the car was running leaner than it was previously.... As far as logging.... I am sure they have a printoutof the RPM versus A/F ratio of the run................
Beroz
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:46 AM
  #52  
Asura's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, Orange County
Default

Actually he tunes by osmosis, telepathy and ESP.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:49 AM
  #53  
wicky's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,828
Likes: 74
From: stuffed in a box
Default

I saw UL tasting the crud from my tailpipes last time I was there.....
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #54  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally posted by wicky
I saw UL tasting the crud from my tailpipes last time I was there.....
See. That's what I meant. Like a super hero.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #55  
beroznikmal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 3
From: yes
Default

And here I thought he pulled the #'s out of his Ass like many other members do.................
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 11:47 AM
  #56  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

The Dynapack logs a MOTEC black wideband sensor, along with all ambient conditions, manifold pressure, torque, hp, etc.

A car with a stock ECU runs very rich, and the Mugen header does nothing much to change that, especially up top. Prolene's car has a Mugen ECU, test pipe, N1 exhaust, etc. and was running pretty close to optimal before the Toda header. After adding the Toda the mixture came up by anywhere from 0.5-1 full A/F ratio point.

UL
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 11:50 AM
  #57  
beroznikmal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 3
From: yes
Default

UL what would you say is "optimal"????
Beroz
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 01:08 PM
  #58  
Wael El-Dasher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut via Abu Dhabi
Default

I would like to see any print outs if possible. My car was running low 11's to high 10's in A:F. I was really surprise so see such numbers from a NA engine.

So what A:F did you target? I assume the 14.7 is not the goal with this engine? Perhaps somewhere in the 12:1 range?

cheers

W
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #59  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

After reading UL and other's posts, I targetted 13.7 after the catalytic converter. Here is my AFR plot before and after tuning.

Reply
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 01:32 PM
  #60  
beroznikmal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 3
From: yes
Default

That's pretty much what I have it tuned to gernby,.....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:06 PM.