How large is the S2000 rear end?
It is done because it is the clutch that sets the low point of the drivetrain. If they needed a huge clutch because of the power and frequent clutch engages/disengages, the mass of the tranny would be higher, which is not desirable. But how can they get away with such a tiny clutch? Well, for one thing, it is exotic material, but mainly because the only time the clutch is slipped is at the start of the race - all the other upshifts and downshifts are paddle-shifts, and the electronics and controlled mechanicals are so precisely manipulated that there is virtually no slippage - hence no wear, hence no need for a giant clutch disc or pressure plate.
I have seen races where the driver overly slipped, fried the clutch, and was either done for the day, or made it pack to the pits for a clutch replacement.
Ain't nature grand?
I have seen races where the driver overly slipped, fried the clutch, and was either done for the day, or made it pack to the pits for a clutch replacement.
Ain't nature grand?
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Road Rage
Most F1 cars are about 4.5" - anyone know why? (This is a quiz).
Most F1 cars are about 4.5" - anyone know why? (This is a quiz).
That's the clutch size. The question was for the rear end size, which was correctly answered as being 7".
Everything about the clutch was dead on though
The Carrera GT is using a 6.6" twin, ceramic disc setup to help lower CoG. That's about 40% smaller than a 911 clutch disc.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



