Supercharger Problems Please Help
If 5-6mph isn't much doesn't the Z06 trap at like 112 in the high 12's?
So if a SC'd s2k = 106 it's only 6mph away from a Z06, which apparently isn't that much?
Really? If that's true it's awesome, I didn't realize a SC'd s2k was that close to a Z06, I thought they were pretty far appart.
(Not joking either)
-Ed
So if a SC'd s2k = 106 it's only 6mph away from a Z06, which apparently isn't that much?
Really? If that's true it's awesome, I didn't realize a SC'd s2k was that close to a Z06, I thought they were pretty far appart.
(Not joking either)
-Ed
by the way wesmaster you said i've never driven a sc s2000 that why if you read my statement i said we have tested TURBO CHARGED,SUPERCHARGED,AND NITROUS S2000's.Thats why i said in MY opinion the supercharger is a waste of money.In that case i would just put a nitrous kit for a quarter of the money and blow supercharged s2000's away.I like spending money but i dont think 4600$$$$$ for a 10% gain is no good and that you have to wait till 9000rpm to get your power.
Originally posted by SpoonS
by the way wesmaster you said i've never driven a sc s2000 that why if you read my statement i said we have tested TURBO CHARGED,SUPERCHARGED,AND NITROUS S2000's.Thats why i said in MY opinion the supercharger is a waste of money.In that case i would just put a nitrous kit for a quarter of the money and blow supercharged s2000's away.I like spending money but i dont think 4600$$$$$ for a 10% gain is no good and that you have to wait till 9000rpm to get your power.
by the way wesmaster you said i've never driven a sc s2000 that why if you read my statement i said we have tested TURBO CHARGED,SUPERCHARGED,AND NITROUS S2000's.Thats why i said in MY opinion the supercharger is a waste of money.In that case i would just put a nitrous kit for a quarter of the money and blow supercharged s2000's away.I like spending money but i dont think 4600$$$$$ for a 10% gain is no good and that you have to wait till 9000rpm to get your power.
My car dyno'd at 200 RWHP stock, it dyno'd at 303 RWHP on the same Mustang dyno. Unless my math is off, that is a 51.5% increase, not 10%
-YS
Originally posted by SpoonS
in my opinion the sc kit for the s2000 is not a very good performance upgrade for this vehicle i have always said superchargers are for domestics which produce a lot of tourque,we have tested turbochargers,nitrous,and sc s2000 and the best one has been turbocharged.For the money i rather have a turbo.
in my opinion the sc kit for the s2000 is not a very good performance upgrade for this vehicle i have always said superchargers are for domestics which produce a lot of tourque,we have tested turbochargers,nitrous,and sc s2000 and the best one has been turbocharged.For the money i rather have a turbo.
Yellow he is using that new math that I keep hearing about.
i dont know why you guys are getting upset its my opinion respect it.For the record i hate nitrous i was just making a statement and the racing i was talking about didnt require turning.I personally like NA always have always will
Spoons why don't you bring the supercharged s2000 on Thursday and we'll run it against mine to see the difference. And I don't know what the hell is wrong with Ricks car But I have a 45% increase in power.
And just because a car does horrible times on the track doesn't mean it is slow.
And just because a car does horrible times on the track doesn't mean it is slow.
Another Nitrous VS. Supercharger thread
!!
I thought one was plenty!
To anyone who thinks the supercharger is a waste of money (most of which don't own one), Sell it (or don't buy one), and quit complaining about it
!! I thought one was plenty!
To anyone who thinks the supercharger is a waste of money (most of which don't own one), Sell it (or don't buy one), and quit complaining about it
thats what everybody says when they drive the car " i think a stock one will beat it" maybe they did do something wrong possibely this thing has been supercharged for a while and sits most of the time the tires are brand new and its a 2000



