S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

AP2 vs. AP1

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 20, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #41  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Aug 20 2006, 07:12 PM
My mistake. I had thought the AP2 was bored. I still think, however, that the 8,000 redline is simply to protect Honda from the warrenty claims that arose from overreving the engine on the downshifts.

I agree that the pistons are traveling faster and farther, but I think the engine could have stood 9,000 rpm. I think the 8,000 rpm redline is a result of American Honda and all of the bent valve warrenty claims.
Rob, some of the tuner experts have done the calculation. As I recall, AP2 pistons at 8,000 rpm are traveling only a bit slower than the AP1 piston at 9000. These same folks suggest that you could bump the AP2 redline to about 8200 to 8300 rpm and be in the same piston speed range as the AP1. Of course, piston speed is only one issue. The AP2 piston and rod assembly may have greater mass than an AP1 assembly and therefore generate greater force at the same piston speed.

All manufacturers set RPM at a point that will minimize damage and warranty claims. But there is a good reason for that. The fact that 90% of the engines can tolerate another 4 or 500 rpm 90% of the time means that at least 10% of the folks will run into some sort of a failure at a higher RPM.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #42  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by valentine,Aug 20 2006, 12:25 PM
Guess I'd better run out and buy that extended warranty I haven't decided about yet. Can't have my pistons, rod and crank in jeopardy. +1 feels the changes that Honda has made to the new engine are excellent changes, but he has similar sentiments to those that Matrix addressed earlier about rpms, etc. I am very conscious of over-revving ANY engine and watch those rpms. The AP2 sounds are more subdued than the AP1, so I've become more in tune with watching the tach than I was with the old one. Bear in mind I'd driven the 01 for almost five years, so I often felt I'd become "one with the car". Its going to take a little time to grab that feeling with the 06. I have NO REGRETS about making the switch and think it was the appropriate decision to make. I do feel kind of sad for all those folks who never had one of the AP1s and whose only experience with the S is the AP2. The AP1 gave a sensation of raw sports car driving that I really do not feel with the AP2. I'm not underestimating the AP2. It is FINE, but it is not as appealing to the purist heart as the AP1.
Not to worry Val. You have no real worries unless you misshift or alter the rev limiter to a higher cut out point.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2006 | 03:29 PM
  #43  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Kyras,Aug 20 2006, 11:39 AM
^Sounds sexy.
Stroked!
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #44  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 33,171
Likes: 1,639
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Aug 20 2006, 06:22 PM
All manufacturers set RPM at a point that will minimize damage and warranty claims. But there is a good reason for that. The fact that 90% of the engines can tolerate another 4 or 500 rpm 90% of the time means that at least 10% of the folks will run into some sort of a failure at a higher RPM.
I agree, absolutely, except that I think American Honda was overly conservative because of the number of claims.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 05:30 AM
  #45  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by valentine,Aug 20 2006, 11:25 AM
I am very conscious of over-revving ANY engine and watch those rpms.
Don't worry about over revving unless you accidently downshift into the wrong gear.

You can bounce of the rev limiter and it will not hurt the engine - just sound terrible and if your on the track or autoxing you'll lose time...
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 05:30 AM
  #46  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Aug 20 2006, 06:25 PM
Not to worry Val. You have no real worries unless you misshift or alter the rev limiter to a higher cut out point.
Guess I should have read the entire thread first!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #47  
valentine's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 22,620
Likes: 867
From: The (S)Low Country
Default

Originally Posted by matrix,Aug 21 2006, 08:30 AM
Don't worry about over revving unless you accidently downshift into the wrong gear.

You can bounce of the rev limiter and it will not hurt the engine - just sound terrible and if your on the track or autoxing you'll lose time...
+1 tells me all the time not to over-worry about over-revving since the rev limiter prevents engine damage. I'd never alter the rev limiter and I'm very concious of hitting that limit. The only time I've ever done it I felt that I should go sit in the corner for doing a really bad thing. I noticed at the nor'easter when folks were getting their cars dyno'd that they hit the rev limiter several times every time. That's why its there, so any safety measures that save my engine life are okay by me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kenvai
S2000 Talk
96
Feb 28, 2014 09:23 AM
eric9107
Florida S2000 Owners
68
Sep 26, 2007 08:17 PM
jaehoppa
S2000 Talk
200
May 7, 2007 02:35 PM
superjimbo
S2000 Talk
8
Aug 24, 2006 04:49 PM
al4t1gbundy
S2000 Talk
16
Jul 25, 2005 11:51 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06 PM.