Bad cars we love, good cars we hate.
#1
Thread Starter
Bad cars we love, good cars we hate.
Bad cars we love, good cars we hate.
Do you agree?
http://t.autos.msn.com/research/buyi...cars-we-hate-1
Do you agree?
http://t.autos.msn.com/research/buyi...cars-we-hate-1
#2
I don't see the story.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OP could have been using a mobile phone when he grabbed the web address for the article. Here's a link via non-mobile internet:
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/bad-c...d-cars-we-hate
BTW, as I tend to like or dislike a car based on bang-for-the-buck meeting goals, and don't give much credence to the shallow whims of the 'we', I thought the article a) near worthless fluff, and b) for the most part didn't reflect my views.
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/bad-c...d-cars-we-hate
BTW, as I tend to like or dislike a car based on bang-for-the-buck meeting goals, and don't give much credence to the shallow whims of the 'we', I thought the article a) near worthless fluff, and b) for the most part didn't reflect my views.
#5
Thread Starter
OP could have been using a mobile phone when he grabbed the web address for the article. Here's a link via non-mobile internet:
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/bad-c...d-cars-we-hate
BTW, as I tend to like or dislike a car based on bang-for-the-buck meeting goals, and don't give much credence to the shallow whims of the 'we', I thought the article a) near worthless fluff, and b) for the most part didn't reflect my views.
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/bad-c...d-cars-we-hate
BTW, as I tend to like or dislike a car based on bang-for-the-buck meeting goals, and don't give much credence to the shallow whims of the 'we', I thought the article a) near worthless fluff, and b) for the most part didn't reflect my views.
Of course the article is fluff. Many of the features on MSN.com are, but they're fun to look at and think about. Like you, I usually disagree with an awful lot of the content, but still, for what it's worth, they're interesting.
#6
Thanks for the link. I agreed with some and disagreed with others.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wdtd' timestamp='1399340002' post='23145801
OP could have been using a mobile phone when he grabbed the web address for the article. Here's a link via non-mobile internet:
http://editorial.aut...od-cars-we-hate
http://editorial.aut...od-cars-we-hate
Trending Topics
#8
The Ferrari Mondial has made some of these lists and received a lot of criticism and I absolutely LOVED mine as did the previous owner and the current owner as well. Good cars we hate I may consider my Tacoma and previous Toyota 4x4 in this category as they are both very reliable but as I'm not a truck guy they are like an appliance to me.
#9
Most British cars would fall into the Bad cars we love category. Their legendary unreliability still endears many who love them. I wanted an MGB so bad but couldn't afford one after I got out of the service. Then when I could along came kids and sedans. I just attended our annual British car show and there were some great vintage cars in attendance.
#10
Most British cars would fall into the Bad cars we love category. Their legendary unreliability still endears many who love them. I wanted an MGB so bad but couldn't afford one after I got out of the service. Then when I could along came kids and sedans. I just attended our annual British car show and there were some great vintage cars in attendance.