Evolution in textbooks.
40 years ago it was the Big Bang Theory. 20 years ago is was String Theory. Maybe in about 10 years the Quantum physicists will look at the formula generated by their supercomputers, and the output will look like the Sistine Chapel.
Didn't the Greeks or Romans have the 3 "R's", plus music and art? Back to basics wouldn't be bad.
A local (very expensive) private school here in town requires all children, regardless of grade, to learn a language. They also have a class that I WISH I had as a child--time management!
Which reminds me, why am I not working now?
Didn't the Greeks or Romans have the 3 "R's", plus music and art? Back to basics wouldn't be bad.
A local (very expensive) private school here in town requires all children, regardless of grade, to learn a language. They also have a class that I WISH I had as a child--time management!
Which reminds me, why am I not working now?
Originally Posted by dean,Jan 20 2005, 12:11 PM
I know that you didn't say that the stickers should be there, and I didn't intend to imply otherwise. But you have stated that you don't think it's any big deal, which it in fact is.
Originally Posted by cordycord,Jan 20 2005, 01:43 PM
Didn't the Greeks or Romans have the 3 "R's", plus music and art? Back to basics wouldn't be bad.
Originally Posted by valentine,Jan 20 2005, 06:10 PM
Did you forget the quantum wave theory? We should start a thread to discuss quantum mechanics and why particulate matter behaves differently on the quantum level. Perhaps then we could just blow all the theories regarding evolution and creationism out the window and devise our own factual reason that mankind is here. Wouldn't that be incredible -- the great minds of the s2000 club solve the biggest problem known to mankind.
"There are far more mysteries between heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosphies, Horatio".
Originally Posted by dean,Jan 20 2005, 06:09 PM
Blow evolution out the window? Ain't gonna happen! Isn't it true that the current and generally accepted theory among physicists that the universe originated with a singular event, and has evolved to what we observe today, and continues to evolve ?
Isn't it also true that we humans, along with all other life, are constructed of the same matter that is found throughout the universe?
So far, I suppose.... From how far out have we actually done sampling?
Originally Posted by dean,Jan 21 2005, 08:54 AM
But, admittedly, it would have been more correct to confine my statement to the known universe. Mea culpa.
Okeydokey - you're off the hook this time....
Evolution generally refers to any process of change over time; in the context of the life sciences, evolution is a change in the genetic makeup of a group - a population of interbreeding individuals within a species. Since the emergence of modern genetics in the 1940s, evolution has been defined more specifically as a change in the frequency of alleles from one generation to the next.
The word "evolution" is often used as a shorthand for the modern theory of evolution of species based upon Darwin's theory of natural selection. This theory states that all species today are the result of an extensive process of evolution that began over three billion years ago with simple single-celled organisms, and that evolution via natural selection accounts for the great diversity of life, extinct and extant.
As the theory of evolution by natural selection has become universally accepted in the scientific community, it has replaced other explanations including creationism and Lamarckism.
The word "evolution" is often used as a shorthand for the modern theory of evolution of species based upon Darwin's theory of natural selection. This theory states that all species today are the result of an extensive process of evolution that began over three billion years ago with simple single-celled organisms, and that evolution via natural selection accounts for the great diversity of life, extinct and extant.
As the theory of evolution by natural selection has become universally accepted in the scientific community, it has replaced other explanations including creationism and Lamarckism.
^ Alright, you caught me. I deliberately cheated a bit. But the universe is a non biological entity, so the more general definition of evolution applies. I know that's not what you meant, but I never said that I was going to play fair.







