S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

The Killer Angels

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #411  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Sep 13 2006, 10:02 PM
Doesn't hold water with me Vito. Hood sure isn't announcing that the enemy is vulnerable. The Union troops are in and amongst the giant boulders and both Hood and Longstreet know that Hoods division will be destroyed. But hey, lets not wait a couple hours or even a day to get up behind them. Lets go in now and get everyone killed.

The hill isn't covered with cannon, but it is covered with infantry and earlier that day they expected no infantry on that hill. The plan was to march right over it to get to the ridge. Now the hill has infantry and the ground right in front of the Rebel positions is occupied.

The Union is spread out thin? Who says? Even if they are, the confederates don't know that.

The situation in the morning was bad. It was a lot worse as South began the attack. I don't see much for a good leader to take advantage of, except to maneuver to the right. Longstreet knows it too. He just isn't willing to take the risk and do the right thing. Funny that. He's willing to risk his life, but not willing to anger Lee.

What if he just sent Lee a nicely worded message? "Situation on the ground vastly different. Union troops the dug in behind boulders directly ahead of our lines. Union Infanty now occupies the Rocky Hill. Nothing on the high hill. We must continue to maneuver around to the right to take the high ground and flank the enemy." Wouldn't Lee like to know of the change? After all, the counter march took most of the day. Wouldn't Lee understand that the situation on the ground might have changed? AND that there may now be a plan of attack that would be much more effective?
Link below contains a different perspective on day 2's events. Lee saw an opportunity to win the battle, and perhaps the war. Given the corrdination issues, he still nearly wins the battles on both flanks on day 2. After day 2, there is still much fight left in his Army.

As Jerry pointed out the other day, if Warren does not see the "hole" in the Union's defenses, Lee's attack plan is successful, and the Union line is flanked.


http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/getty...llmistakes.aspx
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #412  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Sep 13 2006, 09:02 PM
.....After all, the counter march took most of the day. Wouldn't Lee understand that the situation on the ground might have changed? AND that there may now be a plan of attack that would be much more effective?
Interesting to speculate...added to the idea of revising Lee's order: How different the outcome of Day 2 might have been....if Longstreets countermarch had gone around to the SOUTH....instead of around to the north! I'm not sure of the topography (certainly more woods than fields/ orchard), BUT the mass of the Gray forces could have focused on the tail of the Union fish hook.....including Little Round Top.

Literally HOURS (and energy) were wasted in the countermarch that took place....giving all afternoon for more Union forces to move into position....then
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 07:24 PM
  #413  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

Travelogue Sidebar: Our drive on Oct 7th will start out with a drive right THROUGH the zone of battle, 4 pm, July 2: The Wheatfield [map p 202; lower left corner]. This will just be a 'preview' and shortcut....on our way further west for leaf peeping, etc. All of us on tour will come back to the same area again later in the afternoon of OUR 2nd Day
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #414  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Sep 13 2006, 10:17 PM
Don't you almost get the feeling that Longstreet wanted to lose the battle? I suppose not conscientiously but perhaps subconscientiously, and that is why he is willing to follow Lee's orders.

Longstreet is in that age old predicament, do you do what you know to be right or do you follow orders. A reoccurring theme in every war that has ever been fought.
Unfortunately, tragically, Longstreet opts to follow orders.
Like Lee, Longstreet was a warrior. He wanted to win, victory was his cause. "Go, Mississippi!"

As many times as I've read the book, watched the movie, I never associated Lee or Longstreet with the word tragic. Lee was convinced he could defeat the Union with maneuver on day 2. Formulated a plan to do it. He came close. Lee loved all his troops, loved Longstreet, vice versa. No way Longstreet could "fail" Lee with disobedience. It was enough that Lee would eventually have to deal with Stuart. Longstreet wants Lee to court-martial Stuart.

I'll research Longstreet and communiques with Lee during day 2 events, sometimes key info is left out of KA for brevity.

At Gettysburg, Lee's previous experiences engaging Union infantry and Union generals hurt him. Things are clicking for the Union.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #415  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by paS2K,Sep 13 2006, 11:07 PM
Interesting to speculate...added to the idea of revising Lee's order: How different the outcome of Day 2 might have been....if Longstreets countermarch had gone around to the SOUTH....instead of around to the north! I'm not sure of the topography (certainly more woods than fields/ orchard), BUT the mass of the Gray forces could have focused on the tail of the Union fish hook.....including Little Round Top.

Literally HOURS (and energy) were wasted in the countermarch that took place....giving all afternoon for more Union forces to move into position....then
Things are clicking for the Union.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #416  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Sep 13 2006, 10:50 PM
Val, remember this is a novel and a character study. Also, I'm not so sure. The dynamics here are very unusual.

I think Bill asked a very valid question. Why didn't Longstreet send Lee a message that the situation on the ground is vastly different, and then proceed to do what he knew to be the right course of action.

The honorable thing to do is to follow orders except when it means certain death and defeat.
I don't think the outcome was certain on day 2. Very tough, uphill struggle, yes. They knew that going in, heard the axes, etc. But here's an entire Union corps in a peach orchard, asking for a Your troops are highly motivated, they want to fight. An entire Union corps off the ridge, weakening their battle line.

Take advantage of the "gift." Attack!!
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #417  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

Originally Posted by Vitito,Sep 13 2006, 10:26 PM
....... I never associated Lee or Longstreet with the word tragic. Lee was convinced he could defeat the Union with maneuver on day 2. Formulated a plan to do it. He came close. Lee loved all his troops, loved Longstreet, vice versa. .....


.....and it's time for for me
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #418  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Sep 13 2006, 10:46 PM
I think it all relates back to Lee's little talk with Longstreet before the countermarch. He suggested a good soldier must risk the destruction of the thing he loves. Longstreet takes Lee to mean that Lee thinks him too caring about the men. Longstreet concludes that this must be what Lee thinks is Longstreets motivation for favoring defensive warfare. So I think in the back of Longstreet's mind he is thinking "I'll show him, I can send them all in just like Jackson."
Nah. Longstreet directs his men to attack Sickles corps in the peach orchard, decimates them. At the end of the day, another 10,000 Union casualties, compared to 7,000 Confederate casualties. They did not punch through the line though. Much credit has to be given to Union "generalship," leadership, and the manner in which the federal infantry is engaging. For two days, the fighting on both sides has been ferocious.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 03:25 AM
  #419  
MsPerky's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 45,172
Likes: 4,089
From: Arlington, VA
Default

The reason I'm not posting is that I have been outflanked and outmaneuvered by the rest of you. There is no way I can keep up with this discussion, so I'm reading the book at my leisure. Vito is certainly taking up whatever slack I've left, and then some!
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 04:16 AM
  #420  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Vitito,Sep 14 2006, 12:03 AM
Nah. Longstreet directs his men to attack Sickles corps in the peach orchard, decimates them. At the end of the day, another 10,000 Union casualties, compared to 7,000 Confederate casualties. They did not punch through the line though. Much credit has to be given to Union "generalship," leadership, and the manner in which the federal infantry is engaging. For two days, the fighting on both sides has been ferocious.
No, I think Lee's lecture is heavy on Longstreets mind. Longstreet feels that no one can prove his theory of defensive warfare wrong. He knows his peers and commander do not like it, but he takes comfort in knowing he is right. Then Lee hits him with the "you have to be able to destroy the thing you love" angle and logic plays no part in it. It is a challenge to his courage. A challenge to his commitment. I'm not really saying he is trying to be Jackson. I'm saying that he would now be more likely to do that which he knows is a mistake.

The folks in the peach orchard are one thing, but those in Devil's Den, as we will see, are quite another. And once again, if the union gives up a corps to bring the rebs up in the wrong position, it is a worthwhile sacrafice. We know it wasn't an intentional move by the Union, but if we think that those Union boys in the peach orchard are justification for the frontal assault on the Union flank, then I guess it served just as well as a plan.

I guess in the end I take the facs that the author gives me and assume he spent the words for a reason. After all, there a many things he could have written about concerning this battle. I have to assume he chose his subjects carefully.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 AM.