S2000 CR Article
08-09-2007, 05:49 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S2000 CR Article
08-09-2007, 08:18 AM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diablo99V,Aug 9 2007, 08:13 AM
After hating it so much Im starting to accept it inot the family. Still an S2000. Oh power is not everything.
Trending Topics
08-09-2007, 11:08 AM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so put it in after you buy it.. It's gonna be an R version of the S. That means chassis reinforcement. I dont care for how it looks stock but after a few parts get changed I think it'll be a sik whip.
08-09-2007, 11:49 AM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mia 305
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As stated in the article...
Looks That Kill
Honda says the aforementioned rear wing and lowered and bulging chin significantly reduce high-speed aerodynamic lift (by something like 70 percent). We say those pieces reduce the car's overall visual appeal by 79 percent. The roll bar cowlings (those humps behind the seats) look merely silly.
Too bad, so sad, but its the truth....
Although according to the article...
We're not sure if our lap times were any quicker in the CR compared to the standard car, but we certainly enjoyed the experience more.
makes you wonder what kind of first car testing they do... WTF..?
no comparo in times...supposedly its quicker as stated by Honda, but if they are going to do a first drive...do measurements, factual measurements..to support your article..
Dumb asses..
and just in case....
IBTL BABY!!!!
Looks That Kill
Honda says the aforementioned rear wing and lowered and bulging chin significantly reduce high-speed aerodynamic lift (by something like 70 percent). We say those pieces reduce the car's overall visual appeal by 79 percent. The roll bar cowlings (those humps behind the seats) look merely silly.
Too bad, so sad, but its the truth....
Although according to the article...
We're not sure if our lap times were any quicker in the CR compared to the standard car, but we certainly enjoyed the experience more.
makes you wonder what kind of first car testing they do... WTF..?
no comparo in times...supposedly its quicker as stated by Honda, but if they are going to do a first drive...do measurements, factual measurements..to support your article..Dumb asses..
and just in case....
IBTL BABY!!!!
08-10-2007, 06:50 AM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
same price tag for a stripped car and a lower RPM then the AP2 even...keep hacking at that RPMage...
overpriced POS...i'll go get an lotus and be happier
no proof from honda its faster?(no change in motor..maybe they are saqying the chasis change makes it faster less body flex means less power lost in deliverence?..which can be possible i suppose but not by much i would assume lol) from what i read i really dont see much to be hooplA'ing about the CR...
i'll be happy to kill it when i see it on the road happily mwhahahaha!
call it sibbling rivalry...it has to prove itself to me to respect it honestly i wont go by what i read as the whole begotten truth above all else...
overpriced POS...i'll go get an lotus and be happier
no proof from honda its faster?(no change in motor..maybe they are saqying the chasis change makes it faster less body flex means less power lost in deliverence?..which can be possible i suppose but not by much i would assume lol) from what i read i really dont see much to be hooplA'ing about the CR...
i'll be happy to kill it when i see it on the road happily mwhahahaha!
call it sibbling rivalry...it has to prove itself to me to respect it honestly i wont go by what i read as the whole begotten truth above all else...