Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

BEST summer performance tire

Thread Tools
 
Old May 23, 2011 | 08:31 PM
  #31  
ConanO'Brien's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Syn
I did a ton of research before buying my tires and I ended up going with Star Specs. I really enjoy them. They heat up quickly and are very predictable when they start to reach their limit. They let you know before you get yourself into any trouble.

I don't see myself trying any other tire unless I get a chance to drive another car that happens to have them on already.
Noticing that most people love these. Sounds like these will perform the best from a cornering stand point. How is the road noise and comfort?

edit: Went out to the garage and measured tread depth. Oh boy...2/32 up front and 4/32 in the back outside (2/32 back inside). No problem in dry conditions I know.
Reply
Old May 23, 2011 | 09:34 PM
  #32  
spdracerut's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 75
Default

The Star Specs have a lot of grip for the price, but they are inferior to the Bridgestones in my experience as an overall tire for the reasons I already mentioned. Also, the RE11s were more confidence inspiring to me as compared to the Star Specs. Trust me, I'd love to like the Star Specs as they are cheap, but they just don't do it for me. I've also driven on Yokohamas and Toyos and I still prefer Bridegstone. The only alternative I would consider to the Bridgestones would be the Hankooks.
Reply
Old May 23, 2011 | 09:55 PM
  #33  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

I'm running Star Specs on my AP2 (both 225/255 and 255 square w/ bored out rear wheels on the front), and they're great tires. On my previous NC MX-5, I also ran Star Specs, then AD08's, and preferred the AD08's, but IMO the perfromance difference wasn't worth the price premium.

I'm going to try RS-3's when the Star Specs wear out, everything I've heard indicates that they're the next best thing to RA1's. Hard to beat the price, too!

RE-11's are really popular w/ the auto-x crowd, but a track junkie friend advised that they get greasy when hot and don't stand up to high temps in TX summer tracking. No personal experience, just relaying the feedback.
Reply
Old May 23, 2011 | 10:47 PM
  #34  
woodburn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 5
Default

Some relly good tires are RE01 i have them on ap2v1 and they are great.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 01:27 AM
  #35  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by ConanO'Brien
Hmmm, really how much better would a 225/255 set up be compared to a 215/245?...for purposes of getting the most out of a street setup. I noticed the S04's come in both OEM spec. and 225/255.
On the street? No better, but certainly heavier and more expensive! Bigger fronts will also make the car feel a bit heavier and less sprightly.
225/255 might be worth a couple of tenths vs. 215/245 at the track, but no real benefit on the street IMO, and slightly more prone to hydroplaning in standing water.

Still, I'd look at the tires available in all three "correct" size combinations, as some tire models are only availble in one of them:
215/45-17, 245/40-17
215/45-17, 255/40-17
225/45-17, 255/40-17

Use the Tire Rack website, lots of test results and customer reviews on a ton of tires. Wouldn't get hung up on brand name, but do pay close attention to the test results and survey results of the particular tire MODEL you want.

Also, Dunlop Sport Maxx TT are a great Max Perf tire, but for some reason they don't appear when you do a search on AP2 sizes at the Tire RAck site, although they're available in all four sizes. I've tracked my car with these tires in back and Star Specs up front, and after being scrubbed in (they were brand new), they kept up with the fronts in terms of dry grip.

I'm sure S04's are great, but they are pricey as hell. You don't have to spend that much to get great tires.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 05:37 AM
  #36  
thielepr's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh
A couple common sense notes from me. First of all, do you think it makes sense to get the most extreme tire you can find? Do you really think the tradeoff in wet traction, noise, harshness, and treadlife is worth the small improvement in traction? Keep in mind that there are MANY performance tires out there that offer more traction than you can safely utilize on a public road anyhow. If you plan on racing your car regularly, these considerations change, of course.

I see buying a street tire as an exercise in compromise. Compromise between dry traction, wet traction, ride, treadlife, and price. Exactly what kind of balance of compromise are you looking for? My guess is that an all out, no compromise, 100% dry traction tire is not the best for most people.
Good words!!!

I have the RS-3 and it's the best tire that I've had. For the price there isn't nothing better. I'm on my second set.

But being objective my car is a weekend/track car. So I don't care much about wet performance. I have used on rain at the track and it was ok. I don't care much about thread life since I've only put 4K miles on the car in a year.

My other track car is a 1st gen rx-7. With the XS. Is a very great tire but not as good as the RS-3. However for daily I would choose the XS. It seems to me that the RS-3 are too much for the road for DD.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 05:38 AM
  #37  
Reckon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 1
From: New Market, AL
Default

I have to give it up for the BF Goodrich g-Force Sports I have. Runnin 225/45 up front ($110 a piece) and 255/40 in the rear ($123 a piece) on AP2V1s. They handle extremely well in dry condition - I push my corners all the time. They do well in wet and perform acceptably in snowy conditions as long as they aren't pushed (had to use it once or twice when I was caught in some light snow). They have a good tread life and are reasonably priced. I loved the old g-Force T/A KDWs I used to have and this was a good compromise for DD, especially with good ride comfort and road noise. Reviews don't speak well to them, but I have had no issues with them. I bought the car used with these on and the rears having about 8k miles left on them. The fronts still looked new. I have sinced put 16k miles on my car and replaced the rear tires about 6k miles ago. They are still like new and the fronts look to have minimal wear. I don't have much of an issue with road noise, but then again I have an exhaust, intake and a new sound system .

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....=g-Force+Sport
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 06:37 AM
  #38  
s2kAtTracks's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 20,607
Likes: 6
From: Nashville
Default

I really like the re760's. Just ordered another two rear tires yesterday. Check your local tire shops, was cheaper to buy at discount tire myself then to buy from tire rack
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 08:51 AM
  #39  
RedCelica's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 103
From: Raleigh
Default

Originally Posted by dwight
Originally Posted by RedCelica' timestamp='1306206884' post='20607952
[quote name='ZDan' timestamp='1306189887' post='20607004']
225/45-17 front, 255/40-17 rear
+1 for this setup!
The fronts will fit fine with the stock wheels without rolling the fenders, correct?
[/quote]

on stock wheels? Absolutely...with room to spare!


Originally Posted by ConanO'Brien
Hmmm, really how much better would a 225/255 set up be compared to a 215/245?...for purposes of getting the most out of a street setup. I noticed the S04's come in both OEM spec. and 225/255.
marginal, but remember (generally speaking), the more rubber you put on the road, the more grip you have.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 09:24 AM
  #40  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by thielepr
My other track car is a 1st gen rx-7. With the XS. Is a very great tire but not as good as the RS-3. However for daily I would choose the XS. It seems to me that the RS-3 are too much for the road for DD.
???
RS-3 has way more wet grip than XS. MUCH more appropriate for a DD that is driven in the rain.
You can't have too much wet grip, and the XS falls way short here.

A *good* Max Perf category tire (Conti DW, Dunlop Sport Maxx TT, etc.) would be still more appropriate for DD use.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 PM.