Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Lexus Performance Credibility

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 08:23 AM
  #11  
dombey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale
Default

^the dipstick thing is so interesting...it reminds me of the SMG: it was a POS but dammit the germans insisted it was better than a manual because it was "advanced".
The problem w/ the lack of a dipstick isn't really the technology itself, it's that they use $.05 sensors that suck, break, and are unreliable. I'm sure you could engineer that to work flawlessly, but then it would cost too much relative to having a dipstick.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 08:30 AM
  #12  
dombey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale
Default

Originally Posted by exb00st,Jan 10 2011, 09:21 AM
Anyway, I personally think Lexus did everything ass backwards by launching the LF-A and then building the new IS-F off of the FT-86 platform (that- should have come first). I'm not convinced that they're serious about being 'fun' until that happens.
I'm not sure they are even talking about being fun...are they?
I think as far as they've gotten is to become more serious about performance.

In fact, I think probably MOST performance oriented cars are not "fun" cars to drive on the street. Going fast is fun. Being an idiot is fun. Tracking the cars are fun. But just driving...I don't think you're going to find cars that are more fun than say an elise, an s2k, a miata at any price.

That said, I don't expect a "fun" F-car unless they offer something along the lines of an MR2 with the F treatment...which I doubt is really in the plans.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 09:48 AM
  #13  
SlowTeg's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by dombey,Jan 10 2011, 12:23 PM
^the dipstick thing is so interesting...it reminds me of the SMG: it was a POS but dammit the germans insisted it was better than a manual because it was "advanced".
The problem w/ the lack of a dipstick isn't really the technology itself, it's that they use $.05 sensors that suck, break, and are unreliable. I'm sure you could engineer that to work flawlessly, but then it would cost too much relative to having a dipstick.
Yeah.. by all means, use a pos sensor ALONG WITH the oil dipstick (which many 20XX MY bmw's and mercedes had), but don't just go with the pos sensor. It's all too common that they crap out/act up, and wtf do you do if your oil light comes on, and you can't verify whether the $1 pos sensor went bad, or you're really low on oil? I've seen a few sensors go bad on early MY mercedes, but fortunately they have dipsticks, so you can continue on your trip and get it fixed at a more convenient time. Like I said, cars are becoming Rube Goldberg machines. No thanks.

It'll be interesting to see how the european reliability holds up in another 5+ years as many of these newer euro luxury cars get older and put on more miles.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 09:56 AM
  #14  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

I just think it interesting that BMW will have a 7-mode suspension and 3-mode fuel map, and 300 pound 16-way adjustable seats, but can't be bothered with a simple dipstick. The cars are so expensive any more, why eliminate a dipstick?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:06 AM
  #15  
exb00st's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Default

Because most new luxury car buyers are too lazy to check their own oil or even know where the dipstick is!

"Check oil light? Going to the dealer... right after I pick up my Yorkie, Princess, from the doggie day spa."
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:08 AM
  #16  
The Gasman's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 1
From: Ventura, California, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Wildncrazy,Jan 9 2011, 09:18 PM
I've just gotten rid of an is250 because it had the worst car feel since a 1908's Buick station wagon we had.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:09 AM
  #17  
SlowTeg's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Jan 10 2011, 01:56 PM
The cars are so expensive any more, why eliminate a dipstick?
Because that would be simple, and simple = cheap. If they can get some poor sap to think his car is special and "complicated," more profit for them.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:12 AM
  #18  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by dombey,Jan 9 2011, 10:43 PM
(because they know BMW will defend that title to the bitter end) of an M3, at $10-$15k less equally equipped, with much better economy/reliability/longevity. It has done the trick for them before and I think they'll stick with it.
OK, I'll agree w/ you on much better economy, but how do you get much better reliability than BMW's most reliable car (mine has been 100% reliable today). Similarly, I think longevity is too early to tell for these models, but I think they should both last if maintained well.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:23 AM
  #19  
sparrow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by dombey,Jan 10 2011, 01:30 PM
That said, I don't expect a "fun" F-car unless they offer something along the lines of an MR2 with the F treatment...which I doubt is really in the plans.
mr2 with ferrari treatment? Its been done bruh...








Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #20  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by exb00st,Jan 10 2011, 03:06 PM
Because most new luxury car buyers are too lazy to check their own oil or even know where the dipstick is!

"Check oil light? Going to the dealer... right after I pick up my Yorkie, Princess, from the doggie day spa."
If they are lazy, that's fine - I don't see the need to remove what must account for pennies per car when you are selling $40k and up product. It really strikes me as more for marketing hype than any good engineering reason. Its just part of the further demise of BMW as a motorsport company as it becomes the VW of Germany.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 PM.