Lexus Performance Credibility
^the dipstick thing is so interesting...it reminds me of the SMG: it was a POS but dammit the germans insisted it was better than a manual because it was "advanced".
The problem w/ the lack of a dipstick isn't really the technology itself, it's that they use $.05 sensors that suck, break, and are unreliable. I'm sure you could engineer that to work flawlessly, but then it would cost too much relative to having a dipstick.
The problem w/ the lack of a dipstick isn't really the technology itself, it's that they use $.05 sensors that suck, break, and are unreliable. I'm sure you could engineer that to work flawlessly, but then it would cost too much relative to having a dipstick.
Originally Posted by exb00st,Jan 10 2011, 09:21 AM
Anyway, I personally think Lexus did everything ass backwards by launching the LF-A and then building the new IS-F off of the FT-86 platform (that- should have come first). I'm not convinced that they're serious about being 'fun' until that happens.
I think as far as they've gotten is to become more serious about performance.
In fact, I think probably MOST performance oriented cars are not "fun" cars to drive on the street. Going fast is fun. Being an idiot is fun. Tracking the cars are fun. But just driving...I don't think you're going to find cars that are more fun than say an elise, an s2k, a miata at any price.
That said, I don't expect a "fun" F-car unless they offer something along the lines of an MR2 with the F treatment...which I doubt is really in the plans.
Originally Posted by dombey,Jan 10 2011, 12:23 PM
^the dipstick thing is so interesting...it reminds me of the SMG: it was a POS but dammit the germans insisted it was better than a manual because it was "advanced".
The problem w/ the lack of a dipstick isn't really the technology itself, it's that they use $.05 sensors that suck, break, and are unreliable. I'm sure you could engineer that to work flawlessly, but then it would cost too much relative to having a dipstick.
The problem w/ the lack of a dipstick isn't really the technology itself, it's that they use $.05 sensors that suck, break, and are unreliable. I'm sure you could engineer that to work flawlessly, but then it would cost too much relative to having a dipstick.
It'll be interesting to see how the european reliability holds up in another 5+ years as many of these newer euro luxury cars get older and put on more miles.
I just think it interesting that BMW will have a 7-mode suspension and 3-mode fuel map, and 300 pound 16-way adjustable seats, but can't be bothered with a simple dipstick. The cars are so expensive any more, why eliminate a dipstick?
Because most new luxury car buyers are too lazy to check their own oil or even know where the dipstick is!
"Check oil light? Going to the dealer... right after I pick up my Yorkie, Princess, from the doggie day spa."
"Check oil light? Going to the dealer... right after I pick up my Yorkie, Princess, from the doggie day spa."
Originally Posted by Saki GT,Jan 10 2011, 01:56 PM
The cars are so expensive any more, why eliminate a dipstick?
Originally Posted by dombey,Jan 9 2011, 10:43 PM
(because they know BMW will defend that title to the bitter end) of an M3, at $10-$15k less equally equipped, with much better economy/reliability/longevity. It has done the trick for them before and I think they'll stick with it.
Originally Posted by dombey,Jan 10 2011, 01:30 PM
That said, I don't expect a "fun" F-car unless they offer something along the lines of an MR2 with the F treatment...which I doubt is really in the plans.

Originally Posted by exb00st,Jan 10 2011, 03:06 PM
Because most new luxury car buyers are too lazy to check their own oil or even know where the dipstick is!
"Check oil light? Going to the dealer... right after I pick up my Yorkie, Princess, from the doggie day spa."
"Check oil light? Going to the dealer... right after I pick up my Yorkie, Princess, from the doggie day spa."









