Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Thoughts on the STi

Thread Tools
 
Old May 21, 2005 | 04:03 AM
  #51  
03_AP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,951
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke
Default

since evo's aren't available in Canada - STi would be my first choice if I was forced to rid myself of the s2000.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #52  
neeks127's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

don't get the 03 sti if you plan to keep it stock. i drove my friends stock 03 sti through the moutain twisties and it understeered like a damn pig.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #53  
y2ks2k's Avatar
Registered User
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, WA USA
Default

Originally Posted by CBeyond,May 20 2005, 09:37 AM
I'm considering buying a car to meet these requirements:

1. AS FUN as my S2000
2. More storage capacity for interstate travel.
3. Ability to carry more than one passenger. (Back seats)

The STi appears to be at the top of my list, but I'm going to test drive several other cars as well. Presently I'm not considering the Evo because I prefer the appearance of the STi, and I'm very concerned about the fiscal health of Mitsubishi Motors. Enough said about that.

The main concern is #1 above. I know that a car like the STi is going to be a TOTALLY DIFFERENT experience from the S2000... but... I'm really worried that I will regret moving away from the lightweight tossability, steering precision, braking, and simply the FUN of the S2000. It's so hard to define it really, and I'm afraid I won't fully appreciate it until it's gone.

I know the STi offers many things the S2000 does not, but I don't really care much about straight line performance or quarter mile numbers. I love braking, cornering, accelerating out of a corner, lateral grip, and all the other stuff that goes with that.

STi owners: Can the STi really be AS FUN (doesn't have to be more fun) than an S2000? I wish I could phrase the question more clearly, but it sort of defies rational analysis. I don't want to make a decision to buy a more "practical" car and then regret it later. Thanks for your help!
I honestly think my Sti has far surpassed the fun factor of my S2000's, especially for an every day driver who likes to push it on the roads. IF you take a look at the list of cars down below, the Sti will be the first car in a long time that I have owned for 2 years. Most cars didn
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #54  
y2ks2k's Avatar
Registered User
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, WA USA
Default

Originally Posted by neeks127,May 21 2005, 03:54 PM
don't get the 03 sti if you plan to keep it stock. i drove my friends stock 03 sti through the moutain twisties and it understeered like a damn pig.
I would bet so, since there is no 03 Sti in the USA...

And even if it was an 04... I would take your understeer comment as being one of "not being able to drive" a real AWD system. There
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 08:04 AM
  #55  
jsalicru's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
From: Murrieta
Default

There was recent discussion on ImprezaWRXSTi.com regarding the AWD systems and their differences. Its under a R32 thread.

And yes, just like stated above... EVO at best is 50/50.. while STi is by default 65%R/35%F.. but can lock the diffs at 50/50...

Once you know this, I have to be honest, its amazing to see that the Evo handles so well.


About that understeer. It takes a different driving approach to drive a AWD car.. especially coming from RWD.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 09:58 PM
  #56  
NECurve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

My brother has an 05' Sti. I have driven it several times and it really did not impress me. The speed was not as expected and compared to my S2000 it drove like a boat. The turning radius was huge and the thing had severe understeer. I have heard ffrom other drivers that the EVO is much better in the twisties. you feel more connected to the road and the car does not severely understeer.

My brother put it to me in this manner: The Sti is more grown up (better interior, better daily driver, less of a drivers car). The Evo is more raw (harsher ride, quicker turn-in, less comfy interior). He used the analogy of my S2000 vs the Porsche Boxster. One is more of a raw drivers car and the other is a little more of a grown up daily driver.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 10:16 PM
  #57  
y2ks2k's Avatar
Registered User
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 4
From: Vancouver, WA USA
Default

Originally Posted by NECurve,May 23 2005, 09:58 PM
My brother has an 05' Sti. I have driven it several times and it really did not impress me. The speed was not as expected and compared to my S2000 it drove like a boat. The turning radius was huge and the thing had severe understeer. I have heard ffrom other drivers that the EVO is much better in the twisties. you feel more connected to the road and the car does not severely understeer.

My brother put it to me in this manner: The Sti is more grown up (better interior, better daily driver, less of a drivers car). The Evo is more raw (harsher ride, quicker turn-in, less comfy interior). He used the analogy of my S2000 vs the Porsche Boxster. One is more of a raw drivers car and the other is a little more of a grown up daily driver.
No offense dude but AWD takes a long time to learn, it took me several days at the track to get used to the Sti. I would take your comments of the 2000 Vs the Sti as pure inexperience. Any experienced driver an Sti can utilize the DCCD in a racing setup to achieve an excellent balanced handling even a bit to the overseer side.

a "drive" in an Sti does not make one an expert.

On the fast comment.. I
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 08:32 AM
  #58  
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

Originally Posted by jsalicru,May 20 2005, 10:57 AM
WRX vs EVO... thats cute... open front diffs.. weak 5 speeds...



Also, you post a thread about a clutch install where 1 person posted the price and even he posted a smilie that makes it look likes he got hooked up...

I've seen more than one shop on SoCal that will look at you like you are jocking if you say $500 for a clutch install...

My friend, who is a Porsche Tech... wont do it as side work for $500.00
WRX vs EVO...maybe you're not aware of this but the STi is a sub-set of the WRX. And STi's were invited, it just turns out that in drag racing the WRX's are further along than the STi (even with the weak 5-spd).

Here's a few more links on clutch installs (maybe now you can stop spredding dis-information):

install: $330
http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.ph...+clutch+install

install: under $400
http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.ph...+clutch+install

install: $400-450, and $335
http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.ph...+clutch+install
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #59  
NECurve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Angry

[QUOTE=y2ks2k,May 23 2005, 10:16 PM] No offense dude but AWD takes a long time to learn, it took me several days at the track to get used to the Sti. I would take your comments of the 2000 Vs the Sti as pure inexperience. Any experienced driver an Sti can utilize the DCCD in a racing setup to achieve an excellent balanced handling even a bit to the overseer side.

a "drive" in an Sti does not make one an expert.

On the fast comment.. I
Reply
Old May 25, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #60  
Christople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,881
Likes: 0
From: Corn Country
Default

owned
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:00 PM.