Why is Honda afraid of torque?
Originally Posted by mxt_77' date='Jan 6 2009, 01:20 PM
I'm fairly certain the some countries tax a vehicle based on engine displacement. Honda minimizes these taxes by using small displacement engine. Small displacement = low torque.
Honda is a big enough market to warrant having products catered to our needs/regs, i.e. the US Accord has historically been larger than the ROW model.
"One size fits all" is cheaper, but not the best way to maximize market share.
"One size fits all" is cheaper, but not the best way to maximize market share.
From the post over in S2000 Talk, Honda seems to be moving to two main models - Accords and Civics. More of a one size fits all model.
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=661078
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=661078
Originally Posted by Chris S' date='Jan 6 2009, 01:25 PM
deja vu - the Model T lineup is back! 

Wait
that's what Corvettes have !!!!!
Take the F20C for example... it's not that these engines have low torque (at the crank before gear multiplication, btw), but rather they have exceptionally high horsepower for the given engine size.
Originally Posted by Popeye' date='Jan 6 2009, 07:09 PM
pushrods and buggy springs on every car ..yeah ,,,,devolution
Wait
that's what Corvettes have !!!!!

Wait
that's what Corvettes have !!!!!
As for your quip about Corvettes, the ZR1 clocked 7:26 at the Ring - the 5th best production car time ever, and well over a minute faster than the S2000 and NSX. Another pushrod car, the Viper ACR, recorded the best @ 7:22.
I don't see myself buying a Corvette or Viper, but there's no reason not to respect their performance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Palmateer
Car and Bike Talk
10
Dec 22, 2003 01:54 AM








