Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

BMW M2

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 16, 2015 | 11:52 PM
  #21  
Polemicist's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,326
Likes: 1
From: Ulaanbaatar
Default

This photograph was taken by me in 1978 (where the hell has the time gone...).

Friends with cars like this played a big part in my pre-occupation with muscle cars. It was owned at the time by an older friend, and this seemed an entirely proper thing to do on the evening before it was sold to its new owner. Ha Ha.

This kind of activity would be quite ridiculous in a contemporary 'performance' car, but somehow is quite acceptable in an American car muscle car.

Name:  mach%201.jpg
Views: 114
Size:  98.9 KB

... back on-topc, I can't imagine anyone being the slightest interested in a BMW M2 in 40 years time.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2015 | 12:11 AM
  #22  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

I did that in my Escort van on a straight road at the local sewage works.

UJ went shortly afterwards...
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2015 | 02:50 AM
  #23  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,292
Likes: 830
From: Nottingham
Default

Quality pic. I was a way off my licence in '78

I think we'd all struggle to predict where cars will be in another 27 years. All electric i guess and probably auto drive so old f@#kers like us will be as much relics as that is with our penchant for stupid oversteer, rumbling v8s and screaming v12s

I want my lad to experience it though
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2015 | 06:38 AM
  #24  
WinFreak's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 4
From: London/Surrey - UK
Default

I was born in 78
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2015 | 10:11 AM
  #25  
John57's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 1
From: At Home
Default

I like the idea of the M2 ... but feel an M235i is enough - 4.8 to 62 isn't too shabby and it looks good
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2015 | 10:29 AM
  #26  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,292
Likes: 830
From: Nottingham
Default

Its not a load more grunt is it? I guess, as with other Ms they load std equipment, bespoke the suspension, widen the track etc

The M235 has quite a bare spec
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 10:39 PM
  #27  
S2KIP's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by John57
I like the idea of the M2 ... but feel an M235i is enough - 4.8 to 62 isn't too shabby and it looks good
M cars have never been about straight line performance. It's the way they drive.

M2 has forged parts in the engine, different steering, suspension, brakes, wider track etc etc. It's not as if 4.2 to 60 is slow! Lots of generous kit as standard, really no need to tick any options apart from maybe audio.

I went to BMW and drove the M4 on Friday, poor thing only had 10 miles on the clock and I gave it some stick. Felt faster than my 400 bhp+ Evo IV, and was quick in the bends. Just lacked soul for me. Monthlies worked out at £826 IIRC, car was £63k with some options.

Now looking at M235i and M2 prices. Undecided whether to get one, and if I do whether to run one alongside the S2000 or sell it. Initial M235i was £460, told them to come back to me with it being closer to £400 and I had a missed call yesterday morning.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2015 | 10:54 PM
  #28  
s2k4tony's Avatar
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,151
Likes: 281
From: In the land of pies and pasties
Default

Originally Posted by Nottm_S2
haha

the M2 looks like it's on roids with the flared back arches. shades of this



i reckon size wise the M2 is the M3 really as the new M4 looks massive to me.. and quite contrived styling

I would like to see one in the flesh as they look quite awkward in the pics i've seen over on BMW

edit to say it's over £40k vs the CTR.. the price of RWD?
Boxy but involving that E30. And that's why it's a great, as I understand.
BMW have just become so "obvious" these days. 9 series to come out in 2016 - followed by an M version Limo no doubt
In danger of becoming a bit clinical like VAG/Merc perhaps? Or is this the polished norm we have grown to expect? No excuses from me - I was certainly roped in to the classy looking Gulf.

Pole does point out that a 178bhp 5.8 litre, 3 speed pudding does at least give us all some appreciation for classics. Ridiculous as they are, something like a Mach 1 is much more head turning than a Hot Wheels BMW.
Not so sure it would be cheaper to run than a modern roller skate though
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2015 | 12:48 AM
  #29  
Nottm_S2's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23,292
Likes: 830
From: Nottingham
Default

Depreciation alone would ensure it were for very reasonable commutes

I bought my E92 for pennies shy of £30k in June 2012, it was originally an Oct 2008 car so 3.5 years old and the list price was just shy of £60k. Either they got a discount or a haircut but likely both.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2015 | 09:34 AM
  #30  
John57's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 1
From: At Home
Default

Originally Posted by Nottm_S2
Depreciation alone would ensure it were for very reasonable commutes

I bought my E92 for pennies shy of £30k in June 2012, it was originally an Oct 2008 car so 3.5 years old and the list price was just shy of £60k. Either they got a discount or a haircut but likely both.
My 2450 mile 15 month old Z4 35iS was just under 30K as opposed to the 52K new ! I was happy but I doubt the owner who did 2450 miles whilst losing 22K was !!

I am now looking at an M235i that has lost £15K in 12 months but wonder what I will feel like when the sun comes out next year - that plus a 240i on the cards ... Hmmm ....
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:22 AM.