Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

The Formula 1 Thread - 2013

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:11 AM
  #231  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova
Originally Posted by Heinz '57' timestamp='1366620743' post='22489701


But Alonso had KERS as well whereas a car being overtaken in the DRS zone is at a distinct disadvantage.The overtaker can use DRS and KERS but the one being taken can only use KERS.
Vettel did say that he'd saved up some KERS which allowed him to pass Alonso. Admittedly, we don't know if Alonso had done likewise, but I'd guess that he didn't.
But the point that I am making(pretty badly) is that they were on a level playing field. They BOTH had the choice of using KERS much as they had the choice of which gear to use or how much throttle to use. This does not apply to DRS or to a certain extent to tyres.
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:23 AM
  #232  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

Originally Posted by Dembo
Originally Posted by Heinz '57' timestamp='1366620743' post='22489701
And DRS spoiled Alonsos race.
The two pitstops to try to fix a mechanical problem spoiled Alonso's race. Had the DRS just stopped working, he probably wouldn't have lost much.

Stolen from sniff petrol:" Formula 1 isn’t about two well-matched cars relentlessly overtaking each other in a tense battle of nerve and skill; Formula 1 is about carefully looking after your tyres and waiting for people with laptops to calculate a strategy for pit stops and fuel conservation."

Never a truer word.....
Except it doesn't match reality. Certainly not yesterday's reality. Looked like lots of tense battles of nerve and skill to me, and pit stop and tyre strategy has been a fundamental part of the sport for at least the nearly 30 years I've been watching (and laptops hadn't been invented then).
We have never in the past had tyres that were "designed" to go off in 6 laps, really, how stupid and artificial is that?
I fully agree with you about yesterdays race, it was exciting and posed some interesting questions for the rest of the season, but one swallow does not a summer make.
And also,the DRS on Alonsos car did stop working....in the open position. He drove a stirling race without it after his pitstops.
I could live with KERS but DRS is an abomination which gives an unfair advantage, as for 6 lap tyres....
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:24 AM
  #233  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 2
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

Originally Posted by Heinz '57
But the point that I am making(pretty badly) is that they were on a level playing field. They BOTH had the choice of using KERS much as they had the choice of which gear to use or how much throttle to use. This does not apply to DRS or to a certain extent to tyres.
How are they not on a level playing field with tyres?
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:35 AM
  #234  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Thing is, when a faster car is following a slower one, it's hurt by driving in the "dirty" air. DRS serves to negate this problem, so evens things up a bit.

And when you have two cars with similar performance, it allows for some good racing, as we saw with the McLarens.


Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:41 AM
  #235  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

Originally Posted by Dembo
Originally Posted by Heinz '57' timestamp='1366621883' post='22489716
But the point that I am making(pretty badly) is that they were on a level playing field. They BOTH had the choice of using KERS much as they had the choice of which gear to use or how much throttle to use. This does not apply to DRS or to a certain extent to tyres.
How are they not on a level playing field with tyres?
The first 10 have to start on their qualifying tyres unless they don't set a time. But you know this.
The rest have a choice of tyre to start on.You know this as well.
This is not a level playing field
My racing goes back some 50 years and I don't remember it being unexciting without all these limitations back in the day.But with age comes fading memory.
We are never going to agree on the F1 regs, but without this disagreement we would not be having a discussion.
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:42 AM
  #236  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova
Thing is, when a faster car is following a slower one, it's hurt by driving in the "dirty" air. DRS serves to negate this problem, so evens things up a bit.

And when you have two cars with similar performance, it allows for some good racing, as we saw with the McLarens.
Agree with your second sentence but guess what......
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:53 AM
  #237  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by Heinz '57
Originally Posted by lovegroova' timestamp='1366623303' post='22489732
Thing is, when a faster car is following a slower one, it's hurt by driving in the "dirty" air. DRS serves to negate this problem, so evens things up a bit.

And when you have two cars with similar performance, it allows for some good racing, as we saw with the McLarens.
Agree with your second point but guess what......
It's all one point.
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 01:59 AM
  #238  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

Originally Posted by lovegroova
Originally Posted by Heinz '57' timestamp='1366623769' post='22489738
[quote name='lovegroova' timestamp='1366623303' post='22489732']
Thing is, when a faster car is following a slower one, it's hurt by driving in the "dirty" air. DRS serves to negate this problem, so evens things up a bit.

And when you have two cars with similar performance, it allows for some good racing, as we saw with the McLarens.
Agree with your second point but guess what......
It's all one point.
[/quote]
See edit
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 02:21 AM
  #239  
lovegroova's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,771
Likes: 311
From: Stanmore
Default

Originally Posted by Heinz '57
Originally Posted by lovegroova' timestamp='1366624400' post='22489744
[quote name='Heinz '57' timestamp='1366623769' post='22489738']
[quote name='lovegroova' timestamp='1366623303' post='22489732']
Thing is, when a faster car is following a slower one, it's hurt by driving in the "dirty" air. DRS serves to negate this problem, so evens things up a bit.

And when you have two cars with similar performance, it allows for some good racing, as we saw with the McLarens.
Agree with your second point but guess what......
It's all one point.
[/quote]
See edit
[/quote]

Still a bit confused.

DRS didn't give one car an unfair advantage in the case of the McLarens. Evenly matched cars were able to get alongside each other and race, rather than the following car getting close and then having to back off and follow over 1 second behind because of the dirty air, as used to be the case. It was even worse when the following car was faster but ended up stuck behind with no chance of getting past.
Old Apr 22, 2013 | 03:10 AM
  #240  
Heinz '57's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 70
From: Lincolnshire Wolds
Default

Overtaking using DRS requires no skill. How many times do you here commentators say "He is a sitting duck" or "He can do nothing about it"
One car having an artificial advantage over another does not make them evenly matched.
Why not do away with DRS and just use KERS to overtake? Oh, that would mean that both cars could use KERS and would be evenly matched.
And on the subject of tyres, what is wrong with control tyres? Works in other classes.
We are never going to agree so I will just have to be satisfied with admiring drives like Alonsos.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.