Car Talk - Non S2000 General Motoring and Non S2000 Car Talk

The Formula 1 Thread - 2015

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 5, 2015 | 02:32 PM
  #141  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by Shiskine
Originally Posted by LeMoose' timestamp='1423060116' post='23493181
I would've loved that myself, but Adrian Newey said to Ted before one of his Jerez notebooks that the livery was just to keep some of their trick aero pieces hidden.
It does work. Here's a new vs old photo. To the right of the photo, below the Re of Red Bull, are those aero parts or camo patterns ...

It's a moot point anyhow, it's the engine that matters not the aero.
Old Feb 5, 2015 | 02:39 PM
  #142  
MR.CLIFFORD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Default

LOL
Old Feb 6, 2015 | 10:35 AM
  #143  
imc27's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 429
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by s2k_Nut
Originally Posted by Shiskine' timestamp='1423105746' post='23494121
[quote name='LeMoose' timestamp='1423060116' post='23493181']
I would've loved that myself, but Adrian Newey said to Ted before one of his Jerez notebooks that the livery was just to keep some of their trick aero pieces hidden.
It does work. Here's a new vs old photo. To the right of the photo, below the Re of Red Bull, are those aero parts or camo patterns ...

It's a moot point anyhow, it's the engine that matters not the aero.
[/quote]


It's both. Back in the Senna/Prost era Honda supplied McLaren with a significant power advantage, which meant that they could trade drag for downforce and run bigger wings. But the engine regs have become much tighter and more prescriptive, so the engines are much closer in terms of power output. Granted, Mercedes had an estimated 80bhp advantage in the first year of the new formula, but the only other team to have won races had a much greater power deficit but arguably better aero.

Last year, Mercedes managed to put together a package which gave them good aerodynamics (a "Mark 2 front wing which, once it passed the crash test, was able to provide increased downforce through contra-rotating vortices from the front wing supports which dragged more air under the centre section of the wing), and a lower front wishbone which was effectively a single piece of sculpted wing-section until it divided just before it met the tub. A combination of these two features gave greater downforce at the front, and fed more air to the rear diffuser. Coupled to a more powerful engine/ERS and the titles were theirs to lose.

Power is nothing without aero.
Old Feb 13, 2015 | 05:43 AM
  #144  
LeMoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Default

According to PlanetF1 there could be some pretty interesting changes in a couple of years.

For those who like the idea of 1000BHP F1 cars, the F1 Strategy Group met in Paris and have agreed a plan to see them introduced in 2017.
They’ll also be looking at ways to add downforce and bring in wider tyres.
Old Feb 13, 2015 | 06:18 AM
  #145  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 2
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

Ricciardo drives Helmut Marko's Alfa on roads of Targa Florio:

http://www.redbulletin.com/int/en/sp...speed-merchant

Old Feb 19, 2015 | 09:17 AM
  #146  
s2k_Nut's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 0
From: Here and awake!
Default

Originally Posted by imc27
Originally Posted by s2k_Nut' timestamp='1423179171' post='23495251
[quote name='Shiskine' timestamp='1423105746' post='23494121']
[quote name='LeMoose' timestamp='1423060116' post='23493181']
I would've loved that myself, but Adrian Newey said to Ted before one of his Jerez notebooks that the livery was just to keep some of their trick aero pieces hidden.
It does work. Here's a new vs old photo. To the right of the photo, below the Re of Red Bull, are those aero parts or camo patterns ...

It's a moot point anyhow, it's the engine that matters not the aero.
[/quote]


It's both. Back in the Senna/Prost era Honda supplied McLaren with a significant power advantage, which meant that they could trade drag for downforce and run bigger wings. But the engine regs have become much tighter and more prescriptive, so the engines are much closer in terms of power output. Granted, Mercedes had an estimated 80bhp advantage in the first year of the new formula, but the only other team to have won races had a much greater power deficit but arguably better aero.

Last year, Mercedes managed to put together a package which gave them good aerodynamics (a "Mark 2 front wing which, once it passed the crash test, was able to provide increased downforce through contra-rotating vortices from the front wing supports which dragged more air under the centre section of the wing), and a lower front wishbone which was effectively a single piece of sculpted wing-section until it divided just before it met the tub. A combination of these two features gave greater downforce at the front, and fed more air to the rear diffuser. Coupled to a more powerful engine/ERS and the titles were theirs to lose.

Power is nothing without aero.
[/quote]

Adrian Newey would argue with you.
Old Feb 19, 2015 | 11:33 AM
  #147  
LeMoose's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Default

Another poor day of testing for McLaren-Honda.
First day of testing in Barcelona came to a halt after only 20-something laps with a big KERS-related issue.
An issue where the faulty part needs a complete redesign.

So if they're unlucky, the same problem can occur every day of testing until the new part arrives, whenever that'll be.
And, the team has also used up their two days of on-track filming already - apparently in an effort to rack up some track miles.

I'm sure Alonso is thrilled about moving away from Ferrari right about now
Old Feb 19, 2015 | 08:11 PM
  #148  
PhilipGB's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Default

If stuff ain't breaking it's probably because you're slow.

Ferrari were monstrously reliable in Alonso's stint there, but never set the pace.

I think McLaren and Honda may have something that has serious pace once they fix the issues.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 02:20 AM
  #149  
ianl's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 4
From: The Beautiful South
Default

Originally Posted by LeMoose
.....

I'm sure Alonso is thrilled about moving away from Ferrari right about now
I am quite sure that Fred's thinking is a little more considered and long term than that.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 03:02 AM
  #150  
Dembo's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,112
Likes: 2
From: Banbury, Oxfordshire
Default

As they say it's easier to make an unreliable fast car reliable than it is to make a reliable slow car fast.

And McLaren's problems so far are nothing like what Red Bull were going through this time last year. And they did all right.

Interesting that Maldanado yesterday beat Hamilton's 2014 pole position time at Barcelona. I guess it might be that Lotus is now better than Mercedes, or that Maldanado is a better driver than Hamilton, but more likely is that the tyres and engine improvements really are going to make the cars a couple of seconds faster this year.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 PM.