The Corner House of Whores and Monkeys. Enter for Fun & Shenanigans! We're weird here. In the most awesome way possible.

Attn: Apple whores

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #141  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

Chaz... I hate to say it.. but I'm in Massachusetts.. this place blows.. lol. It's a Nazi state and traffic is a beyatch!!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #142  
mikes2k's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 88,444
Likes: 21
From: Pt. A to Pt. B via VTEC!!
Default

:throwscomputerplatformPOO:
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:34 AM
  #143  
Chazmo's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by Dark_Sub_Rosa,Sep 3 2005, 12:43 PM
Chaz... I hate to say it.. but I'm in Massachusetts.. this place blows.. lol. It's a Nazi state and traffic is a beyatch!!!!!
Sorry to hear it, buddy. Weather's sure nice today, though.

What part are you in.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #144  
Chazmo's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,315
Likes: 45
From: Central Massachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by jedwards,Sep 3 2005, 12:27 PM
Chazmo you're a bum,


Ah, I see you've been talking to the FP...
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #145  
watermelonman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: wishing I was in -
Default

Originally Posted by jedwards,Sep 2 2005, 09:57 AM
I've thought about your argument WMM and here's the best example (from your's about Nazis) I can come up with.

Nazis invented sarin (the nerve agent) but never used it.
Iraq used sarin on the Kurds.

The nazis were (are) evil but the use of sarin was something they did not do even though they invented it. (It was used in Germany as a pesticide though)

The Iraqis didn't invent sarin but used it. That was very evil.

MS is horrible... anyone who's read my posts know I don't like them. I actually am a fan of Mac OS and hardware though I have said many times that I think their policy of keeping their architecture closed is foolish (and the reason for their fringe player status with 3% market share). I have a Mac and enjoy it. If Mac uses this isnidious technology to protect their crazy policy I will never buy anything Mac again.

I'd be surprised if even you or Mike would defend their use of this horrible MS technology.
Again, all I'm saying is that Apple should be evaluated based on what they actually do with the technology, not what the technology is called or who invented it or what else it might be capable of doing. The other details of various acts of war aren't really relevant, they were brought up to illustrate a point. Who ever pulls the trigger is the murderer, not the manufacturer of the gun, the inventor of a new material used in the gun, the store who sold the gun, or the body responsible for licensing the ownership of the gun.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #146  
watermelonman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: wishing I was in -
Default

Originally Posted by jedwards,Sep 2 2005, 10:00 AM
This is sort of funny considering all the warfare and proposed warfare that is going on today because some nations are trying to develop nuclear capability. Shouldn't we wait until they actually use it to be pissed at them?
Ideally, yes, and most of our criminal law is based around that idea as well. When you make plans to rob a place and obtain the tools to do it, you're not guilty until you break in.

Unfortunately nukes have the downside that we're all dead after the evil act is committed. Thankfully, rights management chips and piracy policies don't have those consequences.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #147  
watermelonman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: wishing I was in -
Default

Originally Posted by jedwards,Sep 2 2005, 11:38 AM
Sure I would... if I could get a better product at a lower price. That wouldn't be the case with a car however. Well a daily. You know full well that track cars that follow this recipe (elise, ariel) make a great buy.

Don't you think the Mac OS is stable enough to run properly on a different platform? I do.

You Mac disciples crack me up sometime. Again, I like Macs. It's just goofy to have to buy the (very good) hardware at inflated prices to get the great OS. What's wrong with saying, 'I love the product but this is what's wrong with it.'
It does limit things but the upside is undeniable. How many years have Intel and Microsoft been dreaming of 64bit address spaces? How many months did it take Apple to make the transition?

Honestly, I'm at the point where I have no problem spending an extra ten bucks on a network card and an extra twenty on a memory module for the piece of mind that it will all actually work together.

That's why I bought an S2000, too. The one and only point that Miata troll (JLB) ever had was that for pure performance per dollar you could do better than the S2000 by buying a Miata and spending thousands on modifications and weeks of your life messing with the thing. Cool, if that's what you want, but that's not what I want.

Nothing is wrong with talking about the problems in Apple's products. I just don't think this is one of the problems.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #148  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

I'm in Chelmsford Chaz
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #149  
watermelonman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: wishing I was in -
Default

Originally Posted by WestSideBilly,Sep 2 2005, 11:50 AM
The variety of hardware available is one of the PCs greatest advantages that WinTel has over Mac. Yes, it causes some invariable headaches, but it gives the knowledgeable user the options to customize his PC as he sees it, and drives companies to make faster and better components. Nvidia vs ATI, Intel vs AMD, Nvidia vs VIA, etc have all 'hurt' Microsoft while greatly helping the consumer.
Same deal here. One can't really say what approach is better; it just comes down to preference I guess. There's clearly upside and downside to each.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #150  
bahula03's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 28,136
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, Washington
Default

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:13 AM.