Dinner and a Movie Discuss your favorite movies foods, restaurants and recipies.

Cloverfield

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #121  
GinoGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 1
Default

I thought it was a pretty cool movie. I must commend on the monster on taking those shells from an M1 Abrams tank and being carpet bombed like a real man.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 01:21 AM
  #122  
SlickShoe671's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: OC, down by da beach
Default

Originally Posted by mubibo,Jan 19 2008, 04:29 PM
kinda a spoiler in a way buuuuuuuuuuuuuut....


did anyone else see "cloverfield's" decent onto Earth?? If not, then pay close attention to the ending of the movie. In the final scene, Rob points the camera out to the ocean. Look closely to the right half of the screen, you can see "something" fall into the water, but it happens kinda quickly. It was pretty interesting to see.

Great Movie BTW!!
Thank God! I just watched it with some friends and nobody else noticed so I started to think I was just seeing shit.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 01:26 AM
  #123  
SlickShoe671's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: OC, down by da beach
Default

Originally Posted by FISH22,Jan 23 2008, 12:22 PM
Well, the reason for the monster taking so many missiles, bullets, etc. is do to the fact that this monster lived in the very deepest parts of the ocean, possibly beneath it. So it has extremely tough skin from the pressure down there.

As for the guy in the alley. I've read that he is japenese and all he says is that he needs to find his wife and daughter and that he cant live without them.
Wrong. It came from space, or the sky at least. See the post above. /\/\/\
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 03:16 AM
  #124  
triman54's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 0
From: Winter Springs, Fl.
Default

Regarding black_mango's observation that it is hard to think that military might cannot defeat this monter, think of it this way. If you view the monster as a metahpor, then its ability to withstand the onslaught of bomb, missles and bullets makes abundant sense. Think of the scenes of falling buildings and billowing clouds of debris which recall the news video of 9-11. I think, without reading too much into the movie, that the director in fact wanted the audience to recall 9-11.

Just like the ostensible impotence of the U.S. to capture or gain retribution against those individuals most responsible for 9-11, despites its best efforts it can neither down this monster. Monsters have always been representative of our deepest fears, whether played out against an political, moral or pyschological backdrop. Beowulf, more so in the recent movie than in the Old English epic, becomes a three dimensional stand-in for the consequences of moral infidelity and the inability to live up to a heroic ideal. Throughout the 50's for instance, the movie monsters or aliens from outer space played on our fears of Soviet communists and death by ICBM. The Day the Earth Stood Still by contrast turns this theme around, with the alien protagonist assuming the role of a redemptive figure who dies and is reborn as a kind of blood sacrifice for man's collective sins.

This movie is entirely more secular in its outlook than Wise's The Day the Earth Stood Still. One theme, perhaps a bit overdone and heavy-handed in the film, is that we need to seize the moment, to live in the here and now, for in the next instant the vicissitudes of life may take us or our loved ones away. We may be lost to forces and influences that feel no malice nor are motivatived to provide us succor, that are primal, elementally existential in composition. After all, is not that sort of monsterous mutablity the most terrifying experience of all?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 07:35 AM
  #125  
evo s2000's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,115
Likes: 1
From: chantilly
Default

Originally Posted by triman54,Jan 27 2008, 04:16 AM
Regarding black_mango's observation that it is hard to think that military might cannot defeat this monter, think of it this way. If you view the monster as a metahpor, then its ability to withstand the onslaught of bomb, missles and bullets makes abundant sense. Think of the scenes of falling buildings and billowing clouds of debris which recall the news video of 9-11. I think, without reading too much into the movie, that the director in fact wanted the audience to recall 9-11.

Just like the ostensible impotence of the U.S. to capture or gain retribution against those individuals most responsible for 9-11, despites its best efforts it can neither down this monster. Monsters have always been representative of our deepest fears, whether played out against an political, moral or pyschological backdrop. Beowulf, more so in the recent movie than in the Old English epic, becomes a three dimensional stand-in for the consequences of moral infidelity and the inability to live up to a heroic ideal. Throughout the 50's for instance, the movie monsters or aliens from outer space played on our fears of Soviet communists and death by ICBM. The Day the Earth Stood Still by contrast turns this theme around, with the alien protagonist assuming the role of a redemptive figure who dies and is reborn as a kind of blood sacrifice for man's collective sins.

This movie is entirely more secular in its outlook than Wise's The Day the Earth Stood Still. One theme, perhaps a bit overdone and heavy-handed in the film, is that we need to seize the moment, to live in the here and now, for in the next instant the vicissitudes of life may take us or our loved ones away. We may be lost to forces and influences that feel no malice nor are motivatived to provide us succor, that are primal, elementally existential in composition. After all, is not that sort of monsterous mutablity the most terrifying experience of all?
wow... so many deep thoughts in a movie review. Your thoughts took me away
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 09:28 AM
  #126  
triman54's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 0
From: Winter Springs, Fl.
Default

Originally Posted by evo s2000,Jan 27 2008, 08:35 AM
wow... so many deep thoughts in a movie review. Your thoughts took me away
Every great review begins and ends with the letters "B" and "S".
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 10:15 AM
  #127  
LAWN KNEE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 9KRPM,Jan 22 2008, 11:32 AM
you might not want to watch this if you have not seen the movie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXXWr...eature=related
That's funny!

I finally saw the movie last night- and I thought it was pretty good (not great, but definitely not bad). But I got the feeling that I was the only one in the theatre that liked it even that much. Alot of people were booing it as soon as the credits started to roll, and the guy sitting in front of me turned around and said "that's the worst movie I've ever saw".

On a good note, I actually appreciated the camera work. Definitely an original movie. If you are going to see it, you should see it on the big screen to get the full effect. Curious to see how the sequel is going to turn out.

BTW- Loved the commentary from "Hud" behind the camera.... the fact that NY is crumbling around him, and he's still trying to hit on the girl- - classic move.

Reply
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #128  
han racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
From: OC
Default

Originally Posted by triman54,Jan 27 2008, 04:16 AM
Regarding black_mango's observation that it is hard to think that military might cannot defeat this monter, think of it this way. If you view the monster as a metahpor, then its ability to withstand the onslaught of bomb, missles and bullets makes abundant sense. Think of the scenes of falling buildings and billowing clouds of debris which recall the news video of 9-11. I think, without reading too much into the movie, that the director in fact wanted the audience to recall 9-11.

Just like the ostensible impotence of the U.S. to capture or gain retribution against those individuals most responsible for 9-11, despites its best efforts it can neither down this monster. Monsters have always been representative of our deepest fears, whether played out against an political, moral or pyschological backdrop. Beowulf, more so in the recent movie than in the Old English epic, becomes a three dimensional stand-in for the consequences of moral infidelity and the inability to live up to a heroic ideal. Throughout the 50's for instance, the movie monsters or aliens from outer space played on our fears of Soviet communists and death by ICBM. The Day the Earth Stood Still by contrast turns this theme around, with the alien protagonist assuming the role of a redemptive figure who dies and is reborn as a kind of blood sacrifice for man's collective sins.

This movie is entirely more secular in its outlook than Wise's The Day the Earth Stood Still. One theme, perhaps a bit overdone and heavy-handed in the film, is that we need to seize the moment, to live in the here and now, for in the next instant the vicissitudes of life may take us or our loved ones away. We may be lost to forces and influences that feel no malice nor are motivatived to provide us succor, that are primal, elementally existential in composition. After all, is not that sort of monsterous mutablity the most terrifying experience of all?
Beyond a doubt thats a good observation. However I dont think that the director even thought about that or tried to convey that message at all, and if he did it was definitely just by accident. the movie was way to simple and geared towards 12 year olds, the lines, the characters, the out of control sloppy monster, nothing really screamed to me "deep underlying intellectual observations here". but good observations nonethelesS.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 12:41 AM
  #129  
SlickShoe671's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: OC, down by da beach
Default

[QUOTE=LAWN KNEE,Jan 27 2008, 11:15 AM]

On a good note, I actually appreciated the camera work.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #130  
bcs's Avatar
bcs
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Default

Originally Posted by SlickShoe671,Jan 27 2008, 02:26 AM
Wrong. It came from space, or the sky at least. See the post above. /\/\/\
Actually...it's been all but officially confirmed that the thing falling into the water was a piece of a satellite.

The splash was far too small to be a 200 foot tall monster.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 PM.