Cloverfield
Originally Posted by Boofster,Jan 4 2008, 02:55 PM
Is it amateur or is it the camera guy from bourne identity? 

Originally Posted by tnguyen0567,Jan 7 2008, 11:10 AM
I will never enjoy movies where they purposely remove image stabilization to make the audience feel in the center of what is going on the screen.
Tan
Tan
Originally Posted by triman54,Jan 8 2008, 10:54 AM
I just watched a few of those flicks over the last few days...it's like nothing more than separate 90 minute chases.

saw the trailer for this lastnight , it "looked" good , but like you guys said , Blair witch one of the worst movies EVER . I recall the movie slogan on the promo posters - "scary as hell" more like "Boring as hell" .
Originally Posted by tnguyen0567,Jan 7 2008, 11:10 AM
I will never enjoy movies where they purposely remove image stabilization to make the audience feel in the center of what is going on the screen.
Tan
Tan
Just saw an advanced screening of it. It was fun! A lot of video camera perspective running through the streets, etc. - if you get motion sickness easily, may not be for you.
One thing, it is a SHORT movie: running time is only 84 minutes w/ credits.
The entire film is from the perspective of the camera - I personlly like the technique, others may feel otherwise.
Oh, I would be remiss if I didn't mention how hot the 2 female leads are... wow.
One thing, it is a SHORT movie: running time is only 84 minutes w/ credits.
The entire film is from the perspective of the camera - I personlly like the technique, others may feel otherwise.
Oh, I would be remiss if I didn't mention how hot the 2 female leads are... wow.
Originally Posted by Boofster,Jan 4 2008, 05:45 PM
It will prolly suck.
I think the initial trailers (back during Transformers) made it look like, "OMFG - What's coming??" But now, the trailers look sorta lame...
Not sure it's gonna be worth the $9.25 ticket.




