Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

notebook for college sis

Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #61  
jasonw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,702
Likes: 0
From: █ SF, CA █
Default

Even Microsoft has some standards...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 09:31 PM
  #62  
rworne's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 7
From: San Fernando Valley, CA
Default

Originally Posted by tinkfist,Jul 24 2006, 08:37 PM
OS X is Linux based.
No, OS X runs on Darwin. Darwin comes from FreeBSD. Call FreeBSD "Linux" and that's a real flamewar...
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 04:23 AM
  #63  
tinkfist's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,689
Likes: 2
From: Farmingdale, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by rworne,Jul 25 2006, 01:31 AM
No, OS X runs on Darwin. Darwin comes from FreeBSD. Call FreeBSD "Linux" and that's a real flamewar...
My bad.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #64  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Originally Posted by rworne,Jul 24 2006, 11:06 PM
You views are the ones that are antiquated. Macs are now not much different than a mid to high-end notebook. The CPU is intel and intel AFAIR makes the motherboards.

They are assembled in the same factory that makes Dell notebooks. Macs have been non-proprietary since the early iMac days of 1998 or so.

You can even install and run XP on an intel Mac using bootcamp with no performance penalty.

Apple has been making great inroads into the PC market with their notebooks and the iMacs are also quite popular. You should check out last week's quarterly announcements. Right now they have a 12% share of the notebook market. Considering all the companies out there marketing notebooks, that's not bad at all - Dell's running what? 29%?
I didn't know that you could build your own now?

Hell I've been owned.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #65  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Jul 24 2006, 11:37 PM
I'm beginning to think exceltoexcel doesn't like Macs.


I don't hate them but WTF would anyone even think that they are worth the crap.

Now if they trully were a better quality product that ran Windows Then they should just make their OS X available to PC users.

Why not let it run on a PC? Then we can all switch to apples OS X since there isn't any difference between them and Dell, gateway right? Instead of paying huge amounts of money for a system that when made by any other major company usually costs less, we could just install it on an emachine and be just as good as all the elite MAC users ... It all about screwing their customers.

THAT'S the problem, if they even thought about working with Microsoft to create a single standard everyday multipurpose OS then they would be no different than gateway, dell etc... Instead they try to create a divide that has never had much of a prayer to work.

This is like Sony realizing they are going to die in the video tape market and coming out with a betamax player that also plays standard VHS tapes.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #66  
tinkfist's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,689
Likes: 2
From: Farmingdale, NJ
Default

So, have you decided on what to get your sis?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #67  
superjimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 1
From: NA
Default

Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Jul 25 2006, 11:33 AM


I don't hate them but WTF would anyone even think that they are worth the crap.

Now if they trully were a better quality product that ran Windows Then they should just make their OS X available to PC users.

Why not let it run on a PC? Then we can all switch to apples OS X since there isn't any difference between them and Dell, gateway right? Instead of paying huge amounts of money for a system that when made by any other major company usually costs less, we could just install it on an emachine and be just as good as all the elite MAC users ... It all about screwing their customers.

THAT'S the problem, if they even thought about working with Microsoft to create a single standard everyday multipurpose OS then they would be no different than gateway, dell etc... Instead they try to create a divide that has never had much of a prayer to work.

This is like Sony realizing they are going to die in the video tape market and coming out with a betamax player that also plays standard VHS tapes.
so have you ever actually owned a mac? because if you haven't, you bitch a lot about something you don't seem to have much exposure to. On the flip side, I'm betting that many of the mac people on this board have a good amount of experience with PCs.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #68  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by exceltoexcel,Jul 25 2006, 02:33 PM


I don't hate them but WTF would anyone even think that they are worth the crap.

Why not let it run on a PC? Then we can all switch to apples OS X since there isn't any difference between them and Dell, gateway right? Instead of paying huge amounts of money for a system that when made by any other major company usually costs less, we could just install it on an emachine and be just as good as all the elite MAC users ... It all about screwing their customers.
Its quality control - Macs used to be licensed but quality suffered, so now its all in house again. Once reason everything just works on them. Imagine if we could all build our own cars - quality would not be uniform or as good as just buying a car from Honda.

As for paying huge amounts of money, Apples cost the same as comparably equipped Windows computers from Sony, Dell, HP, etc.

[QUOTE]THAT'S the problem, if they even thought about working with Microsoft to create a single standard everyday multipurpose OS then they would be no different than gateway, dell etc...
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #69  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

[QUOTE=Saki GT,Jul 25 2006, 07:46 PM] Its quality control - Macs used to be licensed but quality suffered, so now its all in house again.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 06:32 PM
  #70  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

Originally Posted by superjimbo,Jul 25 2006, 06:19 PM
so have you ever actually owned a mac? because if you haven't, you bitch a lot about something you don't seem to have much exposure to. On the flip side, I'm betting that many of the mac people on this board have a good amount of experience with PCs.
Why would I want to buy a propriatary PC? Why would anyone. Especially now that they have the many of the same componets for nearly 3x as much as a PC. No thank you. I;ve used them, they look slick the OS is a great piece of programing the hardware is dramatically overpriced and I'm a developer. What good is it to develop programs for a continously coming back from near death platform?
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 AM.