Originally Posted by jmc1971' date='Jan 27 2005, 09:01 PM

You either can't understand the case or you are trying to mislead on purpose. Or both. Read the opinion. All of it. The opinion finds that the FCC did not violate the First Amendment.

Of course the holding is narrow. It's a First Amendment case! They're all bloody narrow.

It comes down to this: we're going to have to agree to disagree. Not a bad solution as the Court itself has problems on this issue.

Edit: And no hard feelings, I would hope. All in good fun. Rage on! Viva Cohen! (My favorite 1st Amend case incidently...even went to a Halloween party dressed as Cohen. Look up Cohen vs. California--you should like it.)

Originally Posted by oOweEe' date='Jan 27 2005, 09:40 PM

wat if one of your family member or a close friend was killed during the disaster? or maybe if this song aimed at your race... maybe then its not so "SIMPLE"....bastard.

I am sure if anyone made a song mocking the victims of 9/11 would make you think otherwise (if your an America).


another thing... its amazing how they allowed the radio to say ch*nk and not n*gger.

Originally Posted by YaoMing' date='Jan 28 2005, 05:53 AM

This turn out to be a pretty good debated.....But i'm going to give this round to JMC1971 and HwangTKD. And F1s2000 give it a rest, you bring absolutely noting to the table.

Originally Posted by honda606' date='Jan 28 2005, 11:46 PM

You are in need of some serious professional help. No joke. No homo.

Originally Posted by F1s2000' date='Jan 28 2005, 08:18 AM

I am defending myself . Because your Clueless homeboy HwangTKD was trying to put worlds in my mouth and falsely accuse me. I would see why you would think I have nothing to bring to the table. You're only concern is what was done wrong to you and who the song affected.