Who Else is Running XP?
Originally posted by SECRET AP1
The only reason we aren't running XP here at work is because of a few kinks that has to do with backward compatibility (plus the fact that our staff doesn't know XP that well and training would be $$).
The only reason we aren't running XP here at work is because of a few kinks that has to do with backward compatibility (plus the fact that our staff doesn't know XP that well and training would be $$).
[QUOTE]Originally posted by 4IGS2000
[B]Windows XP SUCKs....
You cant USE Windows Office 2000
You cannot use certain DB softwares like ACT
you cannot use certain Adobe Programs
FOCK YOU BILL GATEs.. I hate your Focking Monopoly Software SCAMs....
[B]Windows XP SUCKs....
You cant USE Windows Office 2000
You cannot use certain DB softwares like ACT
you cannot use certain Adobe Programs
FOCK YOU BILL GATEs.. I hate your Focking Monopoly Software SCAMs....
Originally posted by SECRET AP1
built-in wireless client manager is a definite plus.. great for laptops. it can be user-friendly, but can be switched over to advanced user-mode too for most functions.
it's pretty well supported now. i dont see a problem with upgrading.
built-in wireless client manager is a definite plus.. great for laptops. it can be user-friendly, but can be switched over to advanced user-mode too for most functions.
it's pretty well supported now. i dont see a problem with upgrading.
I'm using Windows XP Pro with Office 2000. No problems there. I really like XP even more than I liked Windows 2000 (which I had been using at home since it first came out). If you don't like the cutesy interface of XP, no big deal. Just switch your start menu back to classic mode, switch your theme to classic mode and put your icons back on the desktop. Problem solved.
Now, I don't have a feel for the speed of XP versus Win2k, especially in a limited resource environment (like 128 MB of RAM). My home machine has 1 GB of RAM. That's more than a few of my NT servers at work.
Now, I don't have a feel for the speed of XP versus Win2k, especially in a limited resource environment (like 128 MB of RAM). My home machine has 1 GB of RAM. That's more than a few of my NT servers at work.
We're using XP pro here @ work as well. I have one machine running XP pro @ home but I'm changing the two PC's at home out for iMAC's with the 17" Monitors when they become available. OS X rocks..
I'll probably have to run Virtual PC (XP) on one of them so I can still use MS Money 2002, I really like it and it's far superior to Quicken 2002.
I'll probably have to run Virtual PC (XP) on one of them so I can still use MS Money 2002, I really like it and it's far superior to Quicken 2002.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



