Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

windows 7

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #31  
Mr. Eryozgatliyan's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,920
Likes: 1
From: Rancho Palos Verdes, Ca.
Default

You guys and your women like bickering
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #32  
Ted H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
From: Jersey City, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT,Aug 13 2009, 03:00 PM
You didn't pull a very good comparison if that's what you got - you overlooked a lot of what a Mac comes with that you need to add to a Dell to get close. Lets take a detailed look:

The 13" Vostro 1320 starts at $1000, the 13" MacBook Pro is $1200, and a regular MacBook, which is most like the Vostro with its plastic body, $1000.

For the Dell, add $85 to get the same 2.26Ghz processor as the 13" MacBook Pro, $46 for the integrated webcam, $25 for Bluetooth, $50 for the cheapest 802.11a/g/n wireless card, and $110 for a similar graphics card to both the Mac's. Grand total, $1,407. Add $70 for the 9-cell battery to get life equal to the Mac's 7-hour battery and you get $1,477.

The Dell comes with 4GB RAM, so you'll need to add 2Gb to the MacBook Pro at $100, and another $50 for a 250GB hdd. Grand total, $1,350. The MacBook also comes with the backlit keyboard, SD slot for reading cards, and iLife free, fwiw, but we'll not add those parts to this list.

For a regular $1000 MacBook that has the 2.16Ghz processor, you can match RAM and hdd size and get a final price of $1,149.

So, Dell - $1,447, MacBook Pro - $1,350, MacBook - $1,149.

You can clearly see that Macs are no more expensive than comparably equipped PCs - actually, the Dell costs more. Dell is however offering a $300 rebate right now - so with that, you get some savings while that lasts, but even with $300 off, the price difference is only a couple hundred for the MacBook Pro, and the Dell is still more expensive than the regular MacBook.

Add the intrinsic value of a solid metal case, iLife, the backlit keyboard, magnetic power cord, standard keyboard, silent fan, and you easily get some value add that exceeds the Dell.

You can get a PC like the Dell Vostro for a lot less money because Apple doesn't sell stripped-down versions of its computers, but don't equate that with the myth that Macs are more expensive.
I would not compare those two. Firstly, Dell is a sorry excuse for a company as of late. HP/Asus are the way to go.

I'm looking at the 15" size computers. Many of those Macbook Pros at 15"s are barely hitting 4hrs of battery life, as opposed to the PC counterparts which are getting closer to 7.

This HP is $919. It includes 1 battery capable of 8hrs of life, and another capable of over 5. So, over 13hrs total of battery life. The 2.26 Processor, 4GB of Ram, 320GB. And yes, a Back-Lit Keyboard. (and Media Card Slots).

Color Espresso Black edit
Operating system Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium with Service Pack 1 (64-bit) edit
Processor Intel
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #33  
HKStallion's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 14
From: Raleigh
Default

how would Apple stack up against these? i am honestly curious. I only see Mac Pros starting at $2500.
the links can be found on Gotapex.com

* $649.99 after $350 discount: HP Pavilion Elite e9110t w/ 2.66GHz Core 2 Quad, 6GB RAM, 750GB HDD, 512MB NVIDIA GeForce G210 [DVI, HDMI, VGA], LightScribe, Gigabit Ethernet, Wireless-N, Bluetooth, 15-in-1 Card Reader, Integrated 7.1 Sound, Keyboard/Mouse, Windows Vista Home Premium. HP PAVILION ELITE E9110T DESKTOP PC DEAL
* $649.99 after $350 discount: HP Pavilion Elite e9105z w/ 3.0GHz AMD Phenom II X4 945 Quad Core, 6GB RAM, 750GB HDD, 1GB NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 [DVI, HDMI, VGA], LightScribe, Gigabit Ethernet, Wireless-N, Bluetooth, 15-in-1 Card Reader, Integrated 7.1 Sound, HP multimedia keyboard and HP premium laser mouse, Windows Vista Home Premium. HP PAVILION ELITE E9105Z DESKTOP PC DEAL
* $899.99 after $350 discount: HP Pavilion Elite e9180t w/ 2.66GHz Intel Core i7-920, 8GB RAM, 750GB HDD, 1GB ATI Radeon HD 4650, LightScribe, Gigabit Ethernet, 15-in-1 Card Reader, Integrated 7.1 Sound, Keyboard/Mouse, Windows Vista Home Premium, and 2-year warranty! HP PAVILION ELITE E9180T DESKTOP PC DEAL
* $764.99 after $285 discount: HP Pavilion Elite e9150t w/ 2.66GHz Intel Core i7-920, 6GB RAM, 750GB HDD, 512MB ATI Radeon HD 4350, LightScribe, Gigabit Ethernet, 15-in-1 Card Reader, Integrated 7.1 Sound, Keyboard/Mouse, Windows Vista Home Premium. HP PAVILION ELITE E9150T DESKTOP PC DEAL

From now on, HP computers will be eligible for Windows 7 upgrade! HP WINDOWS 7 UPGRADE
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #34  
Quick2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Aug 11 2009, 05:28 PM
finally someone that sees past all the "macs are expensive" BS.


When I bought my macbook pro (when the unibodies frist came out), it was actually slightly cheaper then similar laptops at the time. Can't deny that they don't make a great laptop. Macpro's are also beast
I agree. And there are plenty of macbooks that go OTD for far less than $2000. I just bought a 2.26 gig 2GB 13 inch macbook pro after cross-shopping a lot of different similarly-equipped PC laptops. I paid $1099 for the computer itself and bought the Applecare protection plan (both after academic discounts). And they gave me an iPod Touch. All OTD for about $1400 after tax. I felt that I was getting a better deal from Mac because it felt, subjectively, substantially better engineered and built. I suppose you could say it felt cohesive, like it was all designed to work together (go figure). I wanted to wait until Windows 7 ships on PC laptops, and I would especially like to be able to use a program called OneNote, which is the best notetaking software available (let me know if you use something else and like it, I'm in the market). Go to any college campus (I am a grad student) and you will see that Apple is killing Windows in the 18-24 market. I think that they haven't ported OneNote to Office for Mac in part because they know that it's the only hook keeping many people from transitioning to Mac...and ultimately wasn't compelling enough for me to stay loyal.

I was compelled to buy the Mac after looking at a number of comparably powerful and small PC notebooks, none of which was even remotely close in terms of build quality. It seemed that the PC notebooks were either 15-17 inch monster desktop replacements or expensive superlights. I am, quite frankly, shocked that no PC manufacturer has attempted to compete directly with Apple by offering simple, functional design in an attractive package (I do NOT want an alligator print red laptop, or those ridiculous designs that cover HP laptops on every surface) with good build quality and a midrange price. The Dell Adamo is a sorry attempt to match the Macbook Air...it's a couple years late, and not very powerful or attractive. In a world of Netbooks, it's impossible to justify paying $2000 for an Adamo when an equally powerful package exists for $300.

Quick2k
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #35  
HowardZinn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Default

It looks good, but underneath the shiny exterior the perfomance isn't that much better. I saw an article on benchmarks and a lot of things are SLOWER than windows XP. That's SLOWER than a windows OS written about 10 years ago.

So while it's certainly better than windows vista (which was, let's face it, junk), it's not a huge improvement. While it is an improvement, they need to address some of the core issues of windows, which involves a massive rewrite of the code, not just adding a new dock.

btw I am a 3 OS user, Mac OS X, Debian Linux and Windows XP. OS X is pretty far ahead of the game nowadays, and while windows 7 is catching up, OS X is still 2-3 years ahead imo.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #36  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

wtf PC gets 7 hours of battery life except a little pos netbook? I boot into windows on my macbook and I'm lucky to get 2 hours at best. There are numerous articles on how inefficent windows is at battery life compared to OSX...that's a known fact

My unibody macbook pro gets 5 hours of battery life while doing basic tasks. The new integrated battery macbooks are getting 7+ hours...that's with a full screen (not a pos 8" net book screen).


Facts please....
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #37  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

[QUOTE=HKStallion,Aug 13 2009, 05:26 PM] how would Apple stack up against these? i am honestly curious. I only see Mac Pros starting at $2500.
the links can be found on Gotapex.com

Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 07:35 PM
  #38  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Ted H,Aug 13 2009, 05:29 PM
I would not compare those two. Firstly, Dell is a sorry excuse for a company as of late. HP/Asus are the way to go.
Turn the argument if you want - it wasn't me that compared a Mac to a Dell, I just pointed out that the OP was not correct in saying macs are more expensive.

People say that Macs are more expensive than PCs, yet I just proved that's not true. Arguing that I should be looking at HPs or Acers instead of Dells is a moot point - PCs can and do cost more than Macs. Macs just don't play in the low end of the market.

You can go back and forth all day looking for price advantages, but face the fact that Macs are not that, if any, more expensive than PC alternatives on a hardware basis, and when you look at all the software and workflow advantages, Macs are a great option, although they're not for everyone.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 07:43 PM
  #39  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Aug 13 2009, 08:27 PM
wtf PC gets 7 hours of battery life except a little pos netbook? I boot into windows on my macbook and I'm lucky to get 2 hours at best. There are numerous articles on how inefficent windows is at battery life compared to OSX...that's a known fact

My unibody macbook pro gets 5 hours of battery life while doing basic tasks. The new integrated battery macbooks are getting 7+ hours...that's with a full screen (not a pos 8" net book screen).


Facts please....
Fwiw, my Thinkpad T61's extended 9-cell battery gets 2 to 2.5 hours on a full charge, and has since its new. Battery life is horrible for it, yet its rated at 6 hours. My MacBook Pro is listed at 7 hours and typically gets 4-5.

Of course, battery testing methods are bunk if you ask me - they basically test an idling computer with all services off and screen brightness set to minimum - not how people actually use computers.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #40  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

[QUOTE=HowardZinn,Aug 13 2009, 08:19 PM] It looks good, but underneath the shiny exterior the perfomance isn't that much better.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 PM.