S2000 Brakes and Suspension Discussions about S2000 brake and suspension systems.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Sake Bomb

Coilover recommendations?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #21  
vqz33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Back S2k
any reviews or opinions on stance?

I had stance gr+pro on my 350z, I can't say for the s2k but, Stance was a great coilover imho!!! I've had hks hypermax and tein flex before and the stance adjustability was awesome for street and occasional track days, was very stiff and had a good matching spring rate to shock damping ratio... Also replacement springs are only $30 per corner and the customer service over there is excellent as well as you can get a custom shock and spring ratio set up for a little extra money. I adjusted the pre-load on mine as im sure alot of you don't even want to play with those set up's but I'm pretty experienced with suspension set up's and have been setting up many scca cars for years now and stance has been my favorite coilover thusfar. I bought a s2k recently and will buy these so I will write a review soon!
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 01:16 PM
  #22  
NLM Northern California's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

For the price I would say go for the Mono Flex TEIN's they have been good to me over the course of 2 years.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 11:58 AM
  #23  
Croc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 10
From: Israel
Default

Originally Posted by robinson
Originally Posted by Croc' timestamp='1303548048' post='20498993
there a lot of options but we need to remember also pricing - otherwise just go for Motons/Ohlins and that's it.
KW3 is 30% more than Monoflex.
PSS9+revalving pyts them ~ at Monoflex price.

the best option is to find guys near you with setups you're looking into and try them.

what i don't understand about KWs is softness of their springs.
i see at our local auto-x Miatas with KWs they have quite a firm ride but a lot of body roll - i don't understand the point of such setup.
i would prefer comfortable ride with minimal body roll.
Comfort and minimal body roll are inversely related.
that's exactly what i'm saying - kw v1 has both bad comfort and a lot of body roll.
i guess it takes a lot of tallent to mate 2 controversial traits - but i don't see the point of this setup.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #24  
robinson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 1
From: AZ
Default

I guess I should clarify. You can get a comfortable ride (no bump forces) and minimal body roll (lots of rebound) in many shocks. It just depends on how the shock is valved and how you use it.

Overall there are more than one input that causes driving discomfort. The ride of the front or rear of the car over a bump is controlled by the spring rate and the bump forces. The motion of the car front and rear bouncyness, for lack of better terms, is controlled by the ride frequencies and rebound damping.

I run zero bump and about 3/4 turn from soft for rebound and the body roll is very controlled and does not porpoise much, except over extremely numerous cracks in the pavement. The car glides over bumps and dips with no issues.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 06:29 PM
  #25  
scareyourpassenger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, Ga
Default

I am surprised nobody mentioned koni yellows with eibach perches and springs. For the money it is a great option and beats most coilovers. I would even compare them to the kw v3.
Double adjustment can be a pain if you don't know what you are doing.
Reply
Old May 1, 2011 | 08:39 AM
  #26  
Croc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 10
From: Israel
Default

Originally Posted by robinson
I guess I should clarify. You can get a comfortable ride (no bump forces) and minimal body roll (lots of rebound) in many shocks. It just depends on how the shock is valved and how you use it.

Overall there are more than one input that causes driving discomfort. The ride of the front or rear of the car over a bump is controlled by the spring rate and the bump forces. The motion of the car front and rear bouncyness, for lack of better terms, is controlled by the ride frequencies and rebound damping.

I run zero bump and about 3/4 turn from soft for rebound and the body roll is very controlled and does not porpoise much, except over extremely numerous cracks in the pavement. The car glides over bumps and dips with no issues.
this is good when you can adjust bump and rebound separately.
BTW - thx for the explanation - i was still confused what each parameter does.

maybe my next suspension setup will include separate setup.
for now i'm happy the with Monoflex.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maginnis
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
3
Jan 31, 2013 03:45 PM
s2kevino
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
11
Apr 2, 2012 08:07 PM
adrs2k
S2000 Racing and Competition
27
May 20, 2010 03:41 PM
jdnissanz
S2000 Racing and Competition
26
Jun 10, 2008 08:39 PM
s2k_powered
S2000 Talk
13
Aug 12, 2007 10:58 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 AM.