S2000 Engine Management Engine management topics, map and advice.

Tuning for my New Setup

Thread Tools
 
Old May 4, 2011 | 08:49 AM
  #21  
s57_s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by silvermonster
Originally Posted by s57_s2k' timestamp='1304429520' post='20532356
use external wideband for AFR because AF in the flashpro read richer . or you could use AF corr if you dont have time for a wideband . my wideband reading is very close to AF corr reading .
thats strange. There must be some kind of confusion.

Didn't gernby install a wideband on his car and determine that the AF reading is closer to AF instead of the AF Corr?

AF actually read a tad richer than the WB sensor.

I know on my car, the AF corr and the AF are totally different. AF corr reading much higher than AF.
Im confused also , I have changed my wideband sensor (moved from bosh to NTK ) and I got the same reading . BTW my S is f20 DBW not F22 , maybe that is why .
I'm using NGK AFX powerdex , and I placed my sensor in my test pipe .
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 09:54 AM
  #22  
silvermonster's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Davis
Default

Originally Posted by s57_s2k
Originally Posted by silvermonster' timestamp='1304442737' post='20533312
[quote name='s57_s2k' timestamp='1304429520' post='20532356']
use external wideband for AFR because AF in the flashpro read richer . or you could use AF corr if you dont have time for a wideband . my wideband reading is very close to AF corr reading .
thats strange. There must be some kind of confusion.

Didn't gernby install a wideband on his car and determine that the AF reading is closer to AF instead of the AF Corr?

AF actually read a tad richer than the WB sensor.

I know on my car, the AF corr and the AF are totally different. AF corr reading much higher than AF.
Im confused also , I have changed my wideband sensor (moved from bosh to NTK ) and I got the same reading . BTW my S is f20 DBW not F22 , maybe that is why .
I'm using NGK AFX powerdex , and I placed my sensor in my test pipe .
[/quote]

That could be the reason why. I'm not sure if euro s2k (f20 dbw) uses the same sensor as US model f22 dbw...That can explain why the A/F correction is more accurate than the A/F reading. You guys might be using the same sensor as the civic. I'm not sure.

All I know is that A/F reading from what Gernby did with his car show that A/F is more accurate than A/F corr reading.

I'm looking at doing the e-tuning soon as well. I'm currently running the injen calibration and not the toda. I have for mod wise is injen intake, 70 mm test pipe, and 70 mm exhaust. The only reason why I haven't run the toda map is because we have shitty 91 octane over here. I would feel more at ease if I had 93 to run a more aggressive timing map.
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #23  
steelers743's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 514
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by silvermonster
That could be the reason why. I'm not sure if euro s2k (f20 dbw) uses the same sensor as US model f22 dbw...That can explain why the A/F correction is more accurate than the A/F reading. You guys might be using the same sensor as the civic. I'm not sure.

All I know is that A/F reading from what Gernby did with his car show that A/F is more accurate than A/F corr reading.

I'm looking at doing the e-tuning soon as well. I'm currently running the injen calibration and not the toda. I have for mod wise is injen intake, 70 mm test pipe, and 70 mm exhaust. The only reason why I haven't run the toda map is because we have shitty 91 octane over here. I would feel more at ease if I had 93 to run a more aggressive timing map.
You can try out the toda tune, the ecu will retard timing for the 91 octain....if your getting alot of knocks or feel a lose in power from your last tune i would deff switch back to your old one....but it wouldnt hurt to try it out
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 08:42 AM
  #24  
Swift GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

I started my Evan's E-Tune recently, and just got time to upload his first calibration last night. WOW is all I can say, what an improvement over the Toda tune... without any actual in depth tuning at all, just the base calibration he gave me, the engine is way smoother, the VTEC engagement is much less noticeable, and I'm feeling a very prominent power increase above 6000 especially. My AFR is in the high 11's and 12's across the board now so there is still much tuning to be done, I can't wait
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 09:59 AM
  #25  
EliteTuning's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

14.7-15.5 for part throttle & 12.8-13.2 for wide open throttle (n/a).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iLuveketchup
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
5
May 29, 2012 05:21 AM
ap2blanco
S2000 Engine Management
8
May 19, 2012 11:32 AM
eagans2002
S2000 Modifications and Parts
6
Mar 22, 2010 12:12 AM
calhounboi
S2000 Modifications and Parts
25
Mar 14, 2010 05:21 PM
05AP2S2k
S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum
11
Nov 9, 2009 08:58 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 PM.