Tuning for my New Setup
Originally Posted by s57_s2k' timestamp='1304429520' post='20532356
use external wideband for AFR because AF in the flashpro read richer . or you could use AF corr if you dont have time for a wideband . my wideband reading is very close to AF corr reading .
Didn't gernby install a wideband on his car and determine that the AF reading is closer to AF instead of the AF Corr?
AF actually read a tad richer than the WB sensor.
I know on my car, the AF corr and the AF are totally different. AF corr reading much higher than AF.
I'm using NGK AFX powerdex , and I placed my sensor in my test pipe .
Originally Posted by silvermonster' timestamp='1304442737' post='20533312
[quote name='s57_s2k' timestamp='1304429520' post='20532356']
use external wideband for AFR because AF in the flashpro read richer . or you could use AF corr if you dont have time for a wideband . my wideband reading is very close to AF corr reading .
use external wideband for AFR because AF in the flashpro read richer . or you could use AF corr if you dont have time for a wideband . my wideband reading is very close to AF corr reading .
Didn't gernby install a wideband on his car and determine that the AF reading is closer to AF instead of the AF Corr?
AF actually read a tad richer than the WB sensor.
I know on my car, the AF corr and the AF are totally different. AF corr reading much higher than AF.
I'm using NGK AFX powerdex , and I placed my sensor in my test pipe .
[/quote]
That could be the reason why. I'm not sure if euro s2k (f20 dbw) uses the same sensor as US model f22 dbw...That can explain why the A/F correction is more accurate than the A/F reading. You guys might be using the same sensor as the civic. I'm not sure.
All I know is that A/F reading from what Gernby did with his car show that A/F is more accurate than A/F corr reading.
I'm looking at doing the e-tuning soon as well. I'm currently running the injen calibration and not the toda. I have for mod wise is injen intake, 70 mm test pipe, and 70 mm exhaust. The only reason why I haven't run the toda map is because we have shitty 91 octane over here. I would feel more at ease if I had 93 to run a more aggressive timing map.
That could be the reason why. I'm not sure if euro s2k (f20 dbw) uses the same sensor as US model f22 dbw...That can explain why the A/F correction is more accurate than the A/F reading. You guys might be using the same sensor as the civic. I'm not sure.
All I know is that A/F reading from what Gernby did with his car show that A/F is more accurate than A/F corr reading.
I'm looking at doing the e-tuning soon as well. I'm currently running the injen calibration and not the toda. I have for mod wise is injen intake, 70 mm test pipe, and 70 mm exhaust. The only reason why I haven't run the toda map is because we have shitty 91 octane over here. I would feel more at ease if I had 93 to run a more aggressive timing map.
All I know is that A/F reading from what Gernby did with his car show that A/F is more accurate than A/F corr reading.
I'm looking at doing the e-tuning soon as well. I'm currently running the injen calibration and not the toda. I have for mod wise is injen intake, 70 mm test pipe, and 70 mm exhaust. The only reason why I haven't run the toda map is because we have shitty 91 octane over here. I would feel more at ease if I had 93 to run a more aggressive timing map.
I started my Evan's E-Tune recently, and just got time to upload his first calibration last night. WOW is all I can say, what an improvement over the Toda tune... without any actual in depth tuning at all, just the base calibration he gave me, the engine is way smoother, the VTEC engagement is much less noticeable, and I'm feeling a very prominent power increase above 6000 especially. My AFR is in the high 11's and 12's across the board now so there is still much tuning to be done, I can't wait
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iLuveketchup
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
5
May 29, 2012 05:21 AM




