AEM METH KIT Heads up
Yeah I hear ya. But for me I can make the nylon lines look good. I've strung data cable my whole life and organizing 100+ wires is usually a nightmare so 4 should be cake 
On another note I was thinking of a way to hide everything and make it look clean. I'm thinking of drilling 4 holes in the firewall symmetrical to the distribution block and then putting the dist block in the wiper well and install the 4 quick fittings in the bay. The same way passman did with his aem map sensor ( he posted it in my build thread )

On another note I was thinking of a way to hide everything and make it look clean. I'm thinking of drilling 4 holes in the firewall symmetrical to the distribution block and then putting the dist block in the wiper well and install the 4 quick fittings in the bay. The same way passman did with his aem map sensor ( he posted it in my build thread )
Seems like I have come across some different type of lines and fittings in some water/meth research that were more durable, resisted higher pressures. As long as its a chemical resistant line it should be good. A threaded collar end would be pretty sweet. Or something similar to small Earl lines/fittings.
Originally Posted by o'malley_808,Jan 26 2011, 07:13 AM
Yeah I hear ya. But for me I can make the nylon lines look good. I've strung data cable my whole life and organizing 100+ wires is usually a nightmare so 4 should be cake 
On another note I was thinking of a way to hide everything and make it look clean. I'm thinking of drilling 4 holes in the firewall symmetrical to the distribution block and then putting the dist block in the wiper well and install the 4 quick fittings in the bay. The same way passman did with his aem map sensor ( he posted it in my build thread )

On another note I was thinking of a way to hide everything and make it look clean. I'm thinking of drilling 4 holes in the firewall symmetrical to the distribution block and then putting the dist block in the wiper well and install the 4 quick fittings in the bay. The same way passman did with his aem map sensor ( he posted it in my build thread )
Still up in the air @ this point however.
Originally Posted by sohc_mshue,Jan 27 2011, 12:21 PM
Has anybody with a flow gauge noticed the lag before the meth kicking on and actual flow? It is pretty rediculous on mine.
Originally Posted by sohc_mshue,Jan 27 2011, 08:21 AM
Has anybody with a flow gauge noticed the lag before the meth kicking on and actual flow? It is pretty rediculous on mine.
Point is, spray early, so when it's actually flowing you are getting it when you really need it, up in the boost range.
My thoughts anyway.
Originally Posted by sohc_mshue,Jan 27 2011, 08:21 AM
Has anybody with a flow gauge noticed the lag before the meth kicking on and actual flow? It is pretty rediculous on mine.
This delay is severe enough that you cannot downshift and floor it without running dry for 2-3 sec. From a dig you can compensate by lowering the engagement point so that the injection comes on by the time you get to your desired engagement. But its impossible to tune with accurately, this is why I’m ditching the AEM progressive controller and going with a custom 2 stage. The idea is instant response in any driving scenario, eliminating the pump spool time and using electronic solenoid to open on command injecting instantly wile the pump stays under pressure, that’s the deal.
Originally Posted by siadam,Jan 27 2011, 08:35 AM
I knew the delay would be a potential issue going in, thats why I have mine "activate" on wastegate, that way it gives it time to start spraying when it really needs it.
Point is, spray early, so when it's actually flowing you are getting it when you really need it, up in the boost range.
My thoughts anyway.
Point is, spray early, so when it's actually flowing you are getting it when you really need it, up in the boost range.
My thoughts anyway.






