AEM Over KPro Even Though I Have Emissions Testing?
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 2
From: Gresham, OR
Originally Posted by DFWs2k' timestamp='1342036716' post='21851947
Why not in Oregon
I heard there was an update to Oregon DEQ of some sort and their system now reads a few extra sensors from the ecu, which kpro does not support, or something along those lines.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 671
Likes: 3
From: Portland, OR
I'd like to say the guys at PSI have been professional and kind in conversations. It's the behaviors/delays/inaction that triggered my disclosure - intent is not to thread-jack. Details from the April inquiry are posted here. https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/945...oil-squirters/
- Many respected forum contributors; most agreed black death, knock, too much advance and fuel wash as the irrefutable failure suspects.
- Oil squirter removal / retention was a indeterminate at best, but far below the irrefutables. (I'm electing to keep oil squirters)
- Sleeving consensus was that while overkill, it was not detrimental to longevity vs. stock FRM and in fact should be better in higher-HP / more extreme usage.
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 35
From: Decatur, GA
I love the AEM. I did swap mine for KPro to pass emissions though (and passed in PA). I kind of wish I had kept the AEM and just swapped everything back to stock for emissions time. Now with the KPro, I would have to do a lot of work to go back to stock.
Tim
Tim
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post