S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

disappointed..... dynoed

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 09:12 AM
  #41  
AE85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CoolGuy094
AE85 - The OP does not have ANY means to tune his car in the fashion that you are suggesting. He said he is still on the stock ECU. He can't just go to a tuner and have them "tune" his car. He doesn't have a standalone ECU, GEMU, Flashpro, or anything of the sort. The ONLY tools he has at his disposal are the adjustable rising-rate fuel pressure regulator and the electronic signal modifier unit (MAP clamp) that came with the Comptech kit.

I agree with you that attempting to "tune" the AFR curve by solely using an adjustable fuel pressure regulator is a crude method. I think we (Junky, RAIN H8R, s2konroids, manic, and myself) would all agree with that. But with the OP's current setup, that is the best that he can do. He could take his car back to the dyno, have the tuner hook up a tailpipe sniffer and log AFR's, then adjust the RRFPR while on the dyno to make sure that the majority of his AFR curve is in an optimum range. I, personally, would call that "tuning". Perhaps this is just semantics at this point.

We were suggesting that OP purchase a $100-$200 wideband setup. By purchasing this setup, OP could actually skip the "tuning" session on the dyno if he wanted and just adjust the RRFPR on his own while monitoring how each adjustment changes his AFR readings on his gauge. I would imagine that the tuner would charge a similar amount for a few pulls on a dyno while adjusting the RRFPR. So why not spend that cash on a wideband setup that the OP can now use in the future to safely monitor his AFR and possibly make future adjustments to the RRFPR as needed due to climate change? OP needs to know his AFR's in order to properly dial in the equipment that he currently has equipped on his car.

OP is not going to go out and spend $1,000 on an AEM/Haltech standalone or slightly less on a GEMU (plus another couple hundred dollars on tuning charges) if all he needs to optimize his current setup is a simple wideband gauge system and a few of his own hours doing 3-4 street pulls.

Through the help and guidance of Junky, s2konroids, and old threads on s2ki concerning the matter, I was able to easily setup the RRFPR on my Comptech kit back when I was on 7 PSI using my wideband gauge and making a few street pulls with a buddy in the passenger seat. This setup netted me 290 HP on a Mustang dyno in the winter.
Hi there. I think that would be potentially catastrophic advise. Just my opinion, but here is a couple of very real practical examples of why.

The AF sensor will be measuring the product of the fuel and air in all 4 cylinders (unless you are suggesting he buys 4 of these and have them installed in each runner which I dont get a sense of at $1-200). If he goes and buys the WB02, and then finds he is running lean (as some have suggested), he goes, ouch the guys say I need to put more fuel in (keep in mind there is already the presumption there may be an issue with his setup). He turns up the rising rate adjustable fuel pressure regulator and more fuel goes in, and his AFR's improve (according to his WB02 gauge). Phewl. BUT the issue was an injector in one cylinder was blocked and wasnt flowing sufficient fuel (or injector plug come off or wire broken or or or) and only one of the 4 cylinders was running lean. He now has what he thinks is a decent AFR and drives hard and enjoys life... till bore wash in the other 3 cylinders due to over fueling and detonation in one cylinder blows his engine up.

OR

If he goes and buys the WB02, and then finds he is running rich, he goes, ouch the guys say I need to pull more fuel out. He turns down the rising rate adjustable fuel pressure regulator and less fuel goes in, and his AFR's improve (according to his WB02 gauge). Phewl. BUT the issue was a spark plug had failed in one cylinder wasnt sparking (or a coil failed or wire broken or or or) and only one of the 4 cylinders was running rich. He now has what he thinks is a decent AFR and drives hard and enjoys life... till detonation in the other 3 cylinders due to under fueling and bore wash in one cylinder blows his engine up.

"Tuning" an engine with a RRAFPR and a cheap wideband at to gauge what adjustments you need to make when you have a decent chance you have an issue with your setup is seriously misguided and I get a few of you guys think its the way to go, but OP, dont take my word for it as Im a newb here, please test the scenarios I talked about above with a few tuning shops or tuners and get their opinion.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 10:53 AM
  #42  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by AE85
Hi there. I think that would be potentially catastrophic advise. Just my opinion, but here is a couple of very real practical examples of why.

The AF sensor will be measuring the product of the fuel and air in all 4 cylinders (unless you are suggesting he buys 4 of these and have them installed in each runner which I dont get a sense of at $1-200). If he goes and buys the WB02, and then finds he is running lean (as some have suggested), he goes, ouch the guys say I need to put more fuel in (keep in mind there is already the presumption there may be an issue with his setup). He turns up the rising rate adjustable fuel pressure regulator and more fuel goes in, and his AFR's improve (according to his WB02 gauge). Phewl. BUT the issue was an injector in one cylinder was blocked and wasnt flowing sufficient fuel (or injector plug come off or wire broken or or or) and only one of the 4 cylinders was running lean. He now has what he thinks is a decent AFR and drives hard and enjoys life... till bore wash in the other 3 cylinders due to over fueling and detonation in one cylinder blows his engine up.

OR

If he goes and buys the WB02, and then finds he is running rich, he goes, ouch the guys say I need to pull more fuel out. He turns down the rising rate adjustable fuel pressure regulator and less fuel goes in, and his AFR's improve (according to his WB02 gauge). Phewl. BUT the issue was a spark plug had failed in one cylinder wasnt sparking (or a coil failed or wire broken or or or) and only one of the 4 cylinders was running rich. He now has what he thinks is a decent AFR and drives hard and enjoys life... till detonation in the other 3 cylinders due to under fueling and bore wash in one cylinder blows his engine up.

"Tuning" an engine with a RRAFPR and a cheap wideband at to gauge what adjustments you need to make when you have a decent chance you have an issue with your setup is seriously misguided and I get a few of you guys think its the way to go, but OP, dont take my word for it as Im a newb here, please test the scenarios I talked about above with a few tuning shops or tuners and get their opinion.
In both of those cases, wouldn't the result be an obvious misfire? I've had one coil go bad, as well as one injector wire go out, and in both cases I had an obvious misfire. It was easily known that something wasn't right with the engine. Also in both cases, I would have NEVER been able to achieve any kind of constant AFR that would lead me to believe it was OK to romp on the car.

I stick to my suggestion. We could sit here and set up hypothetical situations all day and get nowhere.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 11:00 AM
  #43  
MBHs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,875
Likes: 5
From: Santa Clartia, Ca
Default

No one is suggesting the FPR is a great tuning solution. What many are saying is that if he wants to run the kit stock like he has it, he can crudely tune the car using the FPR. The only way of doing this is installing a wideband to measure the AFRs. Every tuner ever will tell you that this is not a suggested route and that there are many factors that the FPR cannot cover for. All we are saying is that people have successfully run the OEM ECU, wideband, and FPR with this kit for many many miles.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 11:29 AM
  #44  
herecomesboost's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 6
From: Centreville, Va
Default

Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 11:39 AM
  #45  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by herecomesboost

x2
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 08:05 PM
  #46  
s2k manic's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 13
From: dfw
Default

ae85 if he had a clogged injector that bitch would throw a misfire code just go away now you aren't contributing and the op can pm me junky s2konroids who helped me tune my car when I got started or any of the others that have contributed and you really are trying hard to make enemies here dam
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 08:46 PM
  #47  
AE85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MBHs2k
No one is suggesting the FPR is a great tuning solution. What many are saying is that if he wants to run the kit stock like he has it, he can crudely tune the car using the FPR. The only way of doing this is installing a wideband to measure the AFRs. Every tuner ever will tell you that this is not a suggested route and that there are many factors that the FPR cannot cover for. All we are saying is that people have successfully run the OEM ECU, wideband, and FPR with this kit for many many miles.
There seems to be a decent amount of favour to find the missing 50HP by throwing in a $100 WB02 and adjusting the fuel pressure to find it. Id be very concerned about exhaust gas temperatures and detonation, as much as AFR. AFR is just one (important) element to tuning. I think trying to find the missing HP is best done on a dyno where multiple variables can be assessed in a more control environment. If the OP doesnt, cool, go for whatever WB you like and have some fun tuning on the road (which it can be )
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 08:52 PM
  #48  
AE85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CoolGuy094
Originally Posted by AE85' timestamp='1384366338' post='22875514
Hi there. I think that would be potentially catastrophic advise. Just my opinion, but here is a couple of very real practical examples of why.

The AF sensor will be measuring the product of the fuel and air in all 4 cylinders (unless you are suggesting he buys 4 of these and have them installed in each runner which I dont get a sense of at $1-200). If he goes and buys the WB02, and then finds he is running lean (as some have suggested), he goes, ouch the guys say I need to put more fuel in (keep in mind there is already the presumption there may be an issue with his setup). He turns up the rising rate adjustable fuel pressure regulator and more fuel goes in, and his AFR's improve (according to his WB02 gauge). Phewl. BUT the issue was an injector in one cylinder was blocked and wasnt flowing sufficient fuel (or injector plug come off or wire broken or or or) and only one of the 4 cylinders was running lean. He now has what he thinks is a decent AFR and drives hard and enjoys life... till bore wash in the other 3 cylinders due to over fueling and detonation in one cylinder blows his engine up.

OR

If he goes and buys the WB02, and then finds he is running rich, he goes, ouch the guys say I need to pull more fuel out. He turns down the rising rate adjustable fuel pressure regulator and less fuel goes in, and his AFR's improve (according to his WB02 gauge). Phewl. BUT the issue was a spark plug had failed in one cylinder wasnt sparking (or a coil failed or wire broken or or or) and only one of the 4 cylinders was running rich. He now has what he thinks is a decent AFR and drives hard and enjoys life... till detonation in the other 3 cylinders due to under fueling and bore wash in one cylinder blows his engine up.

"Tuning" an engine with a RRAFPR and a cheap wideband at to gauge what adjustments you need to make when you have a decent chance you have an issue with your setup is seriously misguided and I get a few of you guys think its the way to go, but OP, dont take my word for it as Im a newb here, please test the scenarios I talked about above with a few tuning shops or tuners and get their opinion.
In both of those cases, wouldn't the result be an obvious misfire? I've had one coil go bad, as well as one injector wire go out, and in both cases I had an obvious misfire. It was easily known that something wasn't right with the engine. Also in both cases, I would have NEVER been able to achieve any kind of constant AFR that would lead me to believe it was OK to romp on the car.

I stick to my suggestion. We could sit here and set up hypothetical situations all day and get nowhere.
It may be obvious, it may not be depending on the issue, its not binary in my experience. If you think about the fuelling effect to rob a proposed 50HP, its quite substantial. I agree, no one actually knows the issue, it need to be diagnosed. I just propose that its done in a controlled environment where you can accurately measure changes in power, detonation, EGT (if desired) etc.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 10:52 PM
  #49  
s2k manic's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 13
From: dfw
Default

look guy you seem to know enough to be dangerous so lets brake it down the car runs a stock ecu and a map clamp that limits map sensor voltage to 2.93v. it has a rising rate fuel pressure regulator its a 5to1 so with a static fuel pressure of 58 psi at redline it will have 80-90 psi fuel pressure that makes up for lack of large injectors. the problem is the rrfpr has a piston inside that can stick and cause the car to run lean when that happens the stock ecu tries to stop the damage and it pulls timing which will cause a 50hp loss so will a clogged cat. egt isn't an issue if the afr is good its a supercharged car now with a turbo if you run too much boost and retard the timing to much you will blow fire out threw the turbo and burn valves even if your afr is good. look everyone that has commented has had a supercharged or turboed car for years and have road tuned there cars just stop
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 11:21 PM
  #50  
AE85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s2k manic
look guy you seem to know enough to be dangerous so lets brake it down the car runs a stock ecu and a map clamp that limits map sensor voltage to 2.93v. it has a rising rate fuel pressure regulator its a 5to1 so with a static fuel pressure of 58 psi at redline it will have 80-90 psi fuel pressure that makes up for lack of large injectors. the problem is the rrfpr has a piston inside that can stick and cause the car to run lean when that happens the stock ecu tries to stop the damage and it pulls timing which will cause a 50hp loss so will a clogged cat. egt isn't an issue if the afr is good its a supercharged car now with a turbo if you run too much boost and retard the timing to much you will blow fire out threw the turbo and burn valves even if your afr is good. look everyone that has commented has had a supercharged or turboed car for years and have road tuned there cars just stop
Well, why didnt you say at the start you already knew what the exact issue is with his car? Would have saved us all time. OP, just get a new RRFPR. Problem solved, you have a great skill set to tell that over the keyboard.

Lets review my suggestions. Dont try and tune your car with an AFPR when you have a known issue. Take it to a tuner and examine it in a more controlled environment. No point buying a WB02, because you are taking it to a tuner to resolve in the first instance. If you think thats dangerous advice, I find that quite bizarre.



Here is my current track car, built from a shell.



Has a whole bunch of stuff including IRS conversion... too much to list.

Started out as this.



My daily driver



Me racing the old track car. Sold now.



My Supra 1UZ 4.0 V8 Turbo (500WHP) built from a stock car. Sold now.



My 944 Turbo (400HP). Built from a stock car. Sold now



I could go on, a few other cars over the years that I have modded, but dont assume I know nothing because you dont agree with or understand the points I raised (PS no adjustable fuel regulator in any of those cars above )
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.