Emanage ultimate
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis MD
I ran 1000cc with my old car, it did work but not as good a the AEM did. It stalled at times and ran rough on real hot days. I did find a problem with my car later that may have made my issue worse but I was unsure.
Community Organizer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Originally Posted by s2000Junky' timestamp='1312086494' post='20832029
I think this is correct from talking with urbanDK, but I cant say for sure. He did mention that scaling only goes up to 999cc so some sort of second map was needed. I'm considering going this same rout with the ultimate and ID 1000 so Ive been talking with him about what to expect with some of these things. He should probably chime in on this, although he isn't that active on the board here so you might try to PM him. I know you already have a report with him AJ.
Side note; trq obsessed, I see you have the new NV1200, im considering upgrading to this myself as my NV1000 has got some miles on it. We very well may be with the same set up, although I will be keeping my multi port meth injection. 421whp is healthy but down a little bit from what I would expect with that blower at 15.5psi so I'm questioning if this is in dead the rout I want to take. I was aiming for 450-500whp. What dyno were you on and do you think this is reasonable power with what you have learned with that blower? I find it much more valuable to talk with members vs companies about experience. Being you have the same tuning support system im looking at, its always nice to take advantage of impressions, especially since most are scared of anything but running full standalones in this power range, which is too bad really.
Side note; trq obsessed, I see you have the new NV1200, im considering upgrading to this myself as my NV1000 has got some miles on it. We very well may be with the same set up, although I will be keeping my multi port meth injection. 421whp is healthy but down a little bit from what I would expect with that blower at 15.5psi so I'm questioning if this is in dead the rout I want to take. I was aiming for 450-500whp. What dyno were you on and do you think this is reasonable power with what you have learned with that blower? I find it much more valuable to talk with members vs companies about experience. Being you have the same tuning support system im looking at, its always nice to take advantage of impressions, especially since most are scared of anything but running full standalones in this power range, which is too bad really.
Yeah I havent seen UrbanDK on here for a while so I'll send Brad a PM.
You know it makes sense the GEMU are not as bad as people make out, if you can get one second hand even better
.P.S i got hold of a CT 4" pulley - i make 8.1psi at redline
Cheers
Considering a few things, that I want more then 400whp and Ive stretched my power output with current system well beyond what it was designed for, and that I have some local resource; aka Brad with good results, its something I can step right into with the learning curve done for me, wile I just get up to speed on learning the algorithms to keep in tune myself. Full standalone scares me a bit, I don't want to be dependent on anyone else ,"tuner" to keep my car running well and I like the idea of keeping the factory Honda systems in place, just more reliable overall and I can still pass emissions. I am keeping my eyes open for a used Ultimate and ID 1000 for the right price.
Perfect, that's exactly what I made with the 4"
Community Organizer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
This is my first SC setup. I ordered the 1200 as part of my SOS kit. So I can't compare it to the 1000. Around town the car feels better than stock at all rpms. No feeling of drag; in most cases it feels like it has boost and accelerates much easier than stock. But I am getting noticeably worse fuel economy. Not sure if that's due to drag or due to me always hitting the gas.. 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 1
From: Mill Creek, WA
Max supported injector size is 999, but I have mine set to 750 or something, that seemed to give me the closest "base map" i.e. my idle was relatively close to stoich with that value. My lag time is 1.8 ms or something. Used the same "before" values (cc and lag time) as TO.
Interesting to see the huge injector lag time compensation on TO's screen shot. He also has his injectors scaled smaller than me.
Interesting to see the huge injector lag time compensation on TO's screen shot. He also has his injectors scaled smaller than me.
Community Organizer
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Max supported injector size is 999, but I have mine set to 750 or something, that seemed to give me the closest "base map" i.e. my idle was relatively close to stoich with that value. My lag time is 1.8 ms or something. Used the same "before" values (cc and lag time) as TO.
Interesting to see the huge injector lag time compensation on TO's screen shot. He also has his injectors scaled smaller than me.
Interesting to see the huge injector lag time compensation on TO's screen shot. He also has his injectors scaled smaller than me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post