S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

IP stage 2 progress and help thread

Thread Tools
 
Old May 27, 2010 | 12:24 AM
  #61  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

For tapping the pan with the fitting supplied by InlinePro, my friend and I are a little confused. He didn't have a big enough tap and needs to know what size the pipe thread is and the threading so we can get one.

I believe the AN flare side is 10AN. I belive it is the same as included in the stage 1 kits too. The pipe thread side is what we are trying to figure out. The link below says the size for 10AN is 7/8-14 SAE. Is this the size of the tap that we will need? I have a feeling that I'm making this much more complicated than it is.

http://www.gre6.com/ansize
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 01:39 PM
  #62  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by D1sclaimer,May 23 2010, 11:16 AM
I already have it on the turbo, but heres a picture of a similar piece I'm talking about. In the small picture on the right bottom corner, there would be an o-ring around the middle hole.

Oh ok. You wont need an oring and just the gasket will be just fine. I have the same setup with only the gasket and mine has never leaked.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #63  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Wont putting that patch area on you intercooler hinder the flow of air to the upper portion of the intercooler? I would think it will make it less efficient and make it only work like a smaller intercooler. Say if its a 1000 hp intercooler, now with that restriction to the upper part of the intercooler, it'll be more like an 800 hp intercooler. Could this be possible?
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #64  
Revenge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis MD
Default

Did you have to cut your frame rail to get the turbo to fit?
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 07:58 PM
  #65  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin,May 27 2010, 03:43 PM
Wont putting that patch area on you intercooler hinder the flow of air to the upper portion of the intercooler? I would think it will make it less efficient and make it only work like a smaller intercooler. Say if its a 1000 hp intercooler, now with that restriction to the upper part of the intercooler, it'll be more like an 800 hp intercooler. Could this be possible?
Yeah, it wont be as efficient, but the thing was originally rated at 1200hp and huge. I don't think that it will make it a whole lot worse though. With how much power that I will be runing, I'm 99% sure that I wont have any issues. The top part isn't blocked off. It just has less area in front of it in the end tank.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 08:06 PM
  #66  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by Revenge,May 27 2010, 08:45 PM
Did you have to cut your frame rail to get the turbo to fit?
No, I had no cutting to do. Everything fits, but it is very tight. I had to remove the connector to the oil pressure sensor on the vtec solenoid. I believe that sensor is ignored by the AEM EMS anyways. Theres also a wire and connector to the vtec solenoid that I will have to relocate a little bit away because it was hitting the turbo. I can post pics up tonight in a few minutes of what I am talking about.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #67  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by D1sclaimer,May 27 2010, 10:58 PM
Yeah, it wont be as efficient, but the thing was originally rated at 1200hp and huge. I don't think that it will make it a whole lot worse though. With how much power that I will be runing, I'm 99% sure that I wont have any issues. The top part isn't blocked off. It just has less area in front of it in the end tank.
Well hell, if its that big of an intercooler, you wont have to worry. I was just curious. Carry on my friend. LOL
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #68  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

[QUOTE=D1sclaimer,May 27 2010, 10:06 PM]No, I had no cutting to do.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 08:59 PM
  #69  
D1sclaimer's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Default

I also received my new charge pipe today and compared it with the old one.

Heres a picture comparing both pipes with the pipes at the same position.



Heres a picture comparing both pipes with the BOV flanges pointing the same way.

Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 06:19 AM
  #70  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

I'd def either get a turbo blanket or wrap all of those wires by the vtec solenoid.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:45 PM.