ITB for Turbo

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Mar 21, 2007 | 08:22 AM

#41

smitdog

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 48

Likes: 0

From: moyock nc

WOW.

Mar 21, 2007 | 08:26 AM

#42

2QYK4U

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 6,790

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by fperra' date='Mar 21 2007, 08:15 AM

Yes, 50/50 water-meth direct port using the latest Aquamist setup.

Very nice! I am thinking about going with that same setup.

Mar 21, 2007 | 08:41 AM

#43

S2_PHENOMENON

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 1,244

Likes: 0

That is a very nice Manifold!

Mar 21, 2007 | 08:53 AM

#44

Tyraid2K

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 2,454

Likes: 0

From: Boise, Idaho

I can't wait to see results, it will be hard to tune for sure.

I've been dreaming of doing this for awhile so im going to follow this closely

Mar 21, 2007 | 09:03 AM

#45

fperra

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 3,178

Likes: 0

From: Washington State

I don't think the tuning will be that hard at all. It still will be using a MAP sensor. I'll probably switch from the GM 3 BAR to the AEM 3.5 BAR. It will make for a cleaner install. Since I won't be using an IAC, the hardest part will be the cold start. I'll probably just have to live with that unless I opt for adding an IAC.

Mar 21, 2007 | 09:07 AM

#46

Venomous S

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 5,069

Likes: 4

From: Barkhamsted

Quote:

Originally Posted by fperra' date='Mar 21 2007, 09:54 AM

The biggest advantage is better throttle response and more low to mid range power. As far as reduced flow goes, a single 3 inch throttlebody has a cross sectional area of 7.065 sq. inches. Four 50mm throttlebodies have a total cross sectional area of 12.16 sq. inches. And the stock throttle body is less than 3 inches.

These numbers defenitely speak for themselves. Interested to see some dyno chart comparisons