S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Modding the stock Airbox for turbo application

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 4, 2018 | 02:10 PM
  #41  
spdracerut's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by hatrickstu
Of course, but we aren't talking about some application where this guy is trying to get every last bit out of his setup in terms of efficiency. He has a turbo well below it's full capability and is limiting power intentionally by a significant amount due to the engine being used. We are talking about dropping compressor inlet temps 20-30* (shot in the dark there) to improve his compressor efficiency on a turbo he is hardly leaning on in order to maximize performance... in a car he is purposely limiting performance on. It's essentially a waste of time for this particular situation.
Colder compressor intake air temp also improves spool-up and transient response. If you're of the mentality of not trying to improve or maximize every aspect of a build for get the best performance possible, then sure, suck in hotter air. That same person also wouldn't buy ball bearing turbos or bother with exhaust manifold/headers wrap or turbine housing blankets, etc. And there are those who are like that. Then there are others who look to eek out the best performance possible by paying attention to details.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2018 | 02:11 PM
  #42  
spdracerut's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Pinky
Yup.......but then again I don't know of many that take post compressor air temps and shove it directly into the intake. My plan being a SOS SC. So it's still going to go through the AFTERCOOLER and get temps taken down significantly.

So driving around getting everything(including the SC Coolant) up to a static operating temp and measuring the COLD air intake at the TB vs. the "HOT" air intake at the TB.

That is really the only thing I would be interested in and could care less about compressor efficiency, thermal dynamics, boost pressure(unless this changes with air intake temp) or what the temperature is at the filter..
So.... obviously, you didn't read the article. I guess you don't like going faster.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2018 | 02:23 PM
  #43  
spdracerut's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by 05TurboS2k
Granted colder denser air allows you to not need as big of a compressor but that just means your turbo will spool harder (read faster). In aircraft as we go from 0 to 20k feet, my turbo in my plane gets closer to running out of volume, not pressure. It spools faster yes but the hp is exactly the same at every altitude. There's a little variance in some boosted cars on the dyno due to temp but that's more the case when they have ICs that aren't effective in size or efficiency etc.

The other thing that really matters is PRESSURE or a lack of rather, at the intake. Whatever tiny gains you're hoping to net with colder air are probably easily countered by a more restrictive intake which, means a smaller differential of pressure at the turbo...... exactly the opposite of what you want.

Finally.... that airbox is ugly and takes up vital space. Ditch it.
You know, OEMs do a lot of crazy things to get turbos to spool harder. Twin-scroll, ball bearing, compressor abradable coatings, anti-lag, and e-turbos are on the way. Notice every OEM turbo car has an airbox with a snorkel grabbing air from a cold source at the front of the car. And who said the intake had to be restrictive just because it's getting colder air?

Also, the engine power in your plane I imagine is just controlled by the ECU by regulating boost pressure to get the mass air flow it requires for the desired engine power. Air conditions are drastically different at 20k ft too being much thinner. The air pressure compared to sea level is roughly 0.45. Even with the much colder air up at 20k ft, that only gets your density up to around 0.55 compared to sea level. So yeah, the turbo is going to run out of flow.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2018 | 03:59 PM
  #44  
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 51
Default

Originally Posted by spdracerut
Colder compressor intake air temp also improves spool-up and transient response. If you're of the mentality of not trying to improve or maximize every aspect of a build for get the best performance possible, then sure, suck in hotter air. That same person also wouldn't buy ball bearing turbos or bother with exhaust manifold/headers wrap or turbine housing blankets, etc. And there are those who are like that. Then there are others who look to eek out the best performance possible by paying attention to details.
I'd recommend thermal coatings on the exhaust manifold, turbine housing, and any down pipes/dump pipes and bag the wrap. I've never seen a wrap that isn't a PITA. Coatings work very well.

At 15psi boost, 30psia, the difference between 130F air and 160F air is about 5% in density.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2018 | 09:46 AM
  #45  
spdracerut's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
I'd recommend thermal coatings on the exhaust manifold, turbine housing, and any down pipes/dump pipes and bag the wrap. I've never seen a wrap that isn't a PITA. Coatings work very well.

At 15psi boost, 30psia, the difference between 130F air and 160F air is about 5% in density.
I'm a fan of Swain Tech White Lightning myself
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SII1000
S2000 Modifications and Parts
2
Mar 20, 2014 11:42 AM
tmus
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
16
May 28, 2012 02:11 PM
sicknastyap1
Archived Member S2000 Classifieds and For Sale
0
Oct 26, 2009 05:28 PM
chrisyi1
The S2000 Gallery
26
Nov 28, 2007 10:00 PM
duality
Arizona S2000 Owners
20
May 5, 2007 10:02 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 AM.